Re: Pagelets Proposal

1999-05-08 Thread Richard Dallaway
I've enjoyed reading the thread on Pagelets, but I'm not convinced the whole of the Pagelet proposal is needed. But I could well be missing something here (all clues appreciated!) From what I can gather, all you require is for a bean to have a destroy() method called, if it has one. I.e., if

Re: Pagelets Proposal

1999-05-08 Thread Drew Cox
- From: Christopher Cobb [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 8 May 1999 3:44 To: Drew Cox Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pagelets Proposal Drew Cox wrote: ... I firmly believe your "model" classes should not be tied to a particular presentation format

Re: Pagelets Proposal

1999-05-07 Thread Christopher Cobb
Drew Cox wrote: ... I firmly believe your "model" classes should not be tied to a particular presentation format (JSP, GUI, ??). But remember, this is just a class, not a bean. This "model" class can be composited into, or inherited from, in a JSP-aware bean that handles creating a

Re: Pagelets Proposal

1999-05-07 Thread Rod McChesney
I'm using templates that provide bean access, not JSP, but I find I'm doing what Chris is -- there are the real business objects that are beans, then there are Displayedthing beans that handle presentation issues. They don't do HTML generation but things like getting a menu of objects filtered

Pagelets Proposal

1999-05-06 Thread James Klicman
I think that the processRequest did provide some benefits. Although it really left me wanting a little bit more. The main benefit of processRequest as I see it, is the beginning of some structure and definition of what a JSP bean is. Unfortunately, it seems that some are very against any kind of

Re: Pagelets Proposal

1999-05-06 Thread h wulfson
I like this idea a lot. It helps to have a page-level component in which certain events trigger methods at various times in the request-response loop. This idea is somewhat like the "components" in WebObjects. Every template is bound to a component class, and all the components have a common

Re: Pagelets Proposal

1999-05-06 Thread Rodrigo B. de Oliveira
Agreed. - Original Message - From: James Klicman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 1999 10:01 PM Subject: Pagelets Proposal I think that the processRequest did provide some benefits. Although it really left me wanting a little bit more. The main

Re: Pagelets Proposal

1999-05-06 Thread Drew Cox
t: Friday, 7 May 1999 10:32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pagelets Proposal I like this idea a lot. It helps to have a page-level component in which certain events trigger methods at various times in the request-response loop. This idea is somewhat like the "components" in We