berjack Software LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.JSPInsider.com
>From: John Foulds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: A mailing list about Java Server Pages specification and
> reference <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Two questions
>Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 00:36:28 -0500
Please forgive the dumb questions, but if anyone has a moment or two to
explain it, I would be very grateful.
I have used many scripting languages (ie. jsp, php, asp, cold fusion,
javascript, etc.). Regardless of the language, I understand how they all
allow you to "transactionalize" your work
Hi,
Are you sure that it is true? It works?
xgh.
- Original Message -
From: "Javier Cazares" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 12:09 AM
Subject: Re: Two questions
> .This may work.8)
>
t: Monday, July 10, 2000 12:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Two questions
>
> .This may work.8)
>
> <% myPage = request.getParamter("target"); %>
> <%@ include file=<%= myPage %>%>
>
>
13
Schenectady, NY 12345
P: (518) 385-1521
Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Veena
> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 7:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Two questions
>
> 1) target must be a form element(text or
1) target must be a form element(text or hidden)
2) or target must be a var sent in the query string
How it is done in ur case
- Original Message -
From: Mark Torr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 1:41 PM
Subject: Two ques
I've seen code like this before.
Why on earth do you use <%! %> declarations ??
This is the best way to get debugging headaches because of concurrency
problems.
Why not just use
<% String myPage = request.getParamter("target"); %>
<%@ include file="<%=myPage%>" %>
Geert 'Darling' Van Damme
;.
Help this helps.
xgh
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Torr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: Two questions
> Solved it... here is my final code for anyone interested:
>
> <%! String my
quotes are the key thing...
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Torr
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 10:11
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Two questions
>
> Hi,
>
> 1. A long time back someone pasted an example of using James Clarks XT
> pro
Hi,
1. A long time back someone pasted an example of using James Clarks XT
processor with JSP pages. I cannot locate it in the archives. Can someone
send it to me if they still have a copy.
2. I am trying to read a parameter and based on that I want to include a
file... am I correct in thinking
Of course I actually meany <%! %> tag, my brain just wasn't quite on form
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: DAVE TOWNSEND [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 06 September 1999 08:53
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Two questions
>
>
> Can'
I'm not sure that the spec
specifically allows this.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Mike McElligott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 September 1999 18:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Two questions
1. Last night I was attempting to use a RequestDispatcher object to forward
Mike McElligott wrote:
>
>
> 1. Last night I was attempting to use a RequestDispatcher object to
> forward to another page. That didn't work (I think it may be a
> configuration issue). When I used the
> syntax instead things worked great. I wondered what that tag got
> translated into so I
Mike McElligott wrote:
>2. Can I define a function in jsp? I don't see any reference to doing so
>in the spec. I'm aware that this is the 'wrong' way to do stuff and that I
>should do my logic in a bean, but I want to know if it's possible. It
>seems
>like something that, even if it isn't in t
Mike McElligott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Can I define a function in jsp?
Yes, that's what declarations e.g., <%! void foo() {} %>, are for.
Bob Foster
Symantec Internet Tools http://www.visualcafe.com/
===
To unsubscrib
in JSP1.0 <%! declaration %!> is defined as "Declares variables or
methods valid in the page scriptiong language"
I would suspect you'd be safe defining a function in here... I haven't
tried it so, YMMV...
-gabe
Mike McElligott wrote:
>
>
> 1. Last night I was attempting to use a RequestDispa
Title: Two questions
1. Last night I was attempting to use a RequestDispatcher object to forward to another page. That didn't work (I think it may be a configuration issue). When I used the syntax instead things worked great. I wondered what that tag got translated into so I look
x27;s extension? I hope this will be included in JSP spec.
Thanks much for your help.
Hong Zhang
Uniscape Inc.
>-Original Message-
>From: Thomas Reilly [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Sunday, April 25, 1999 11:40 AM
>To:Hong Zhang
>Subject: Re: Two questions about
Christopher Cobb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With a small hack, you should be able to overcome this:
Nice hack but the latest JRun build (139) fixes this problem. Patches
and new installers are available from our download site.
--
Tom Reilly
Live Software, Inc
http://www.livesoftware.com
==
Hong Zhang wrote:
> . Also, I am currently using JRun. I found that JRun does not implement
> 0.92 correctly that the implicit variable "out" is of type
> ServletOutputStream that does not implement java.io.PrintWriter, as
> specified in the 0.92 spec. Do you know which servlet/jsp runner
> avail
Hi, I am a new comer to this mailing list. I have two questions about
jsp0.92 and its implementations.
. To send non-ASCII character contents (such as multibyte characters)
using servlet, we can set content type using ServletResponse's
setContentType API. If use JSP, how can we set the co
21 matches
Mail list logo