On 9/24/2011 3:50 PM, William Zwicky wrote:
> In my mind, "studio" is just a collection of equipment, and "project"
> is the equipment plus everything required for a song or set. So it
> makes sense that a project would contain *a* studio plus some
> libraries, rather than a studio containing a
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Joe Emenaker wrote:
>
> One question though: What are your thoughts surrounding "Projects" being
> the master context (ie, you can only have one open at a time, and it's
> the thing that holds everything else)? My initial thought was that a
> Studio would be bette
On 9/24/2011 2:25 PM, William Zwicky wrote:
> I've enclosed a sketch of a new GUI,
I haven't had time to look it over in detail, but I like the idea of a
"Studio" window. In fact, my vision for the GUI is that the Studio
window would actually be a pane/frame on the desktop which is always there.
I've enclosed a sketch of a new GUI, based on my own fevered imagination as
well as your suggestions. I'm not certain I'll ever do any of this (sorry)
but I wanted to write down something more concrete than "the GUI sucks". If
someone ever works on the GUI, this might make a good starting point.
I have just put in a patch that slightly changes the way delays work in
sysex. The old behaviour is that no delay is added when sending a sysex
from a driver, unless there is a max buffer size set (either in the
driver or in global prefs) which causes the message to be split up into
fragments as it
