On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:59 AM, frankster wrote:
> Do you think the refactoring is a candidate for 0.21 or are you going to
> hold off for the following release?
>
I posted a plan a few days ago: 0.21 as soon as possible, 0.22 etc as
changes accumulate. Joe's refactor will be released as 0.30.
On 9/8/2011 8:59 AM, frankster wrote:
> On 09/08/11 16:44, Joe Emenaker wrote:
>>SVN, I'm told, *does*
>> support moving, so it's my hope that this will preserve the revision
>> history when the files get moved.
> svn mv core/X org/jsynthlib/X
Yup. It's just a matter of "svn diff" sees "deepl
On 09/08/11 16:44, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> SVN, I'm told, *does*
> support moving, so it's my hope that this will preserve the revision
> history when the files get moved.
svn mv core/X org/jsynthlib/X
> - When I saw how many synthdrivers and other UI components were
> subclassing Actions.MenuFram
On 9/8/2011 3:10 AM, William Zwicky wrote:
> Note that I don't have permissions to post a binary, so we'll need a
> volunteer for that. And if you'd prefer to be the one to BUILD the binary,
> let me know.
I can probably post the binary, but I probably shouldn't build it. I
don't use ant or make
On 09/08/11 11:10, William Zwicky wrote:
> If you're working on something now, please respond with an estimate of how
> long it'll take (powers of ten - 1, 10, 100 days).
>
TC Electronic M350 Effect Unit driver, should be ready in about 1 day.
frankie
I'd like to call for a focused effort to build a new release within no more
than a few weeks. Things that are clear and simple and can be done within a
few days should be wrapped up so we can release. If you're working on
bigger things (like a whole new synth driver) and you expect to take a few
