On 19/09/2011 21:56, Frankie Fisher wrote:
> On 19/09/2011 21:34, Maciej Łoziński wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have two ideas that could improve jsynthlib.
>>
>> One, easier to do is implementing randomization of patches.
> I thought there already was a randomise option,
I've just had a look and it turn
On 09/19/2011 03:56 PM, Frankie Fisher wrote:
>> Second idea is more complicated and to be honest I have no idea how to
>> > realize it:-D But It would be great to be able to translate patches
>> > between synths, at least to some extent.
> You're right, this is ridiculously complicated!
Actual
On 19/09/2011 21:34, Maciej Łoziński wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have two ideas that could improve jsynthlib.
>
> One, easier to do is implementing randomization of patches. It would be
> not much work, as we already have all parameter ranges for patches where
> there are PatchEditors present. There could
Hi
I have two ideas that could improve jsynthlib.
One, easier to do is implementing randomization of patches. It would be
not much work, as we already have all parameter ranges for patches where
there are PatchEditors present. There could be two options - randomize
all parameters, or only para
