[jug-discussion] Vote for JUG Logo

2003-02-03 Thread Webmaster
Hi everyone, We've finally got several logos to choose from for the website logo. You can view the logo entries at: http://www.tucson-jug.org/logos.html To vote, send an e-mail with the name of the entry that you want to vote for to this discussion list. Send your e-mail before the next meet

RE: [jug-discussion] Vote for JUG Logo

2003-02-03 Thread Jon Thomas
Eduardo's is very cool -Original Message- From: Webmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [jug-discussion] Vote for JUG Logo Hi everyone, We've finally got several logos to choose from for the website logo. You can vie

Re: [jug-discussion] Vote for JUG Logo

2003-02-03 Thread Thomas Hicks
At 10:50 AM 2/3/2003 -0700, Webmaster wrote: Hi everyone, We've finally got several logos to choose from for the website logo. You can view the logo entries at: http://www.tucson-jug.org/logos.html I really like what Tim's done with the green gecko and, since it's much easier to modify something

Re: [jug-discussion] Vote for JUG Logo

2003-02-03 Thread William H. Mitchell
I vote for Warner's! A perfect Tucson green! p.s. My wife says she'd like to see Tim's lizard coming out of Eduardo's cup... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [jug-discussion] Vote for JUG Logo

2003-02-03 Thread Lesiecki Nicholas
+1 Large gecko by Tim Colson/TJUG green gecko diagonal by Tim Colson (only difference is size) +1 Eduardo Cheers, nick --- Webmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > We've finally got several logos to choose from for the website logo. > > You can view the logo entries at: > http://w

Re: [jug-discussion] Vote for JUG Logo

2003-02-03 Thread rhightower
+1 the logo that warner created except it needs to be a suguaro not a barrel cactus. > > +1 Large gecko by Tim Colson/TJUG green gecko diagonal by Tim Colson > (only difference is size) > +1 Eduardo > > Cheers, > nick > --- Webmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> We've finally