Re: [jug-discussion] Members only registry

2004-10-22 Thread Thomas Hicks
I don't really see this as a problem. I wasn't intending to take discussions offline, just overhead and infrastructure. For instance, I'd like to borrow Tim's Flex CD (if he has one) since mine doesn't include the Flex Builder application. I find there are loads of silly things like this which ar

Re: [jug-discussion] Members only registry

2004-10-22 Thread Bryan . ONeal
The only problem I would have is say, Person X would like to talk to some one (person Y) about low level system interfaces (like robot, or tie ins to native C++ code) and while I may not be some one who would have great deal of experience with this, I would love to see the messages come across the

Re: [jug-discussion] Members only registry

2004-10-22 Thread Warner Onstine
Sorry Tom, I do think it's a great idea and I'll add it to the list. We need to have a management meeting to discuss items such as this. Ideally this would be a feature available to members only and secured so that our emails aren't publicly available to spammers. -warner On Oct 22, 2004, at 11

Re: [jug-discussion] Members only registry

2004-10-22 Thread Thomas Hicks
I wrote this email awhile ago but it met with dead silence. (No one even said the idea sucked :) Now, here's a perfect example of its applicability. ... I'd like to talk with Tim about Flex but I don't have any way to contact him. A JUG list would be a great solution. Tim, if you have a moment, c