route you were
climbing.
Overall I give you a 7 for the result, but only a 1 for style.
-Original Message-
From: josh zeidner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 1:48 PM
To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org
Subject: RE: [jug-discussion] just curious - flamebait
mber 21, 2006 1:48 PM
> > To: jug-discussion@tucson-jug.org
> > Subject: RE: [jug-discussion] just curious -
> flamebait
> >
> >
> > Flamebait? Thats an interesting way to avoid
> having to
> > state anything that might tarnish your reput
Dude there is WAY more than one local genius on this list (and none
of them are me). But I must agree with Tom that what started out as
somewhat funny and interesting has ended up like a bad SNL skit that
just keeps going on and on
I retire
On Sep 21, 2006, at 1:48 PM, josh zeidner wrote
Nice call, Tim.On 9/21/06, josh zeidner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Flamebait? Thats an interesting way to avoid havingto state anything that might tarnish your reputationas the local genius. -jmzot: you guys are load of laughs--- "Tim Colson (tcolson)" <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>>> > > Josh -
t; Subject: RE: [jug-discussion] just curious - flamebait
>
>
> Flamebait? Thats an interesting way to avoid having to
> state anything that might tarnish your reputation as the
> local genius.
>
> -jmz
>
> ot: you guys are load of laughs
>
> > > &
Flamebait? Thats an interesting way to avoid having
to state anything that might tarnish your reputation
as the local genius.
-jmz
ot: you guys are load of laughs
--- "Tim Colson (tcolson)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > Josh -- if you are sincere about starting a
> discussion
> > Josh -- if you are sincere about starting a discussion on
> the topic of
> > JCP and JUG Goverance, then by all means walk your own talk
> and start
> > a new thread with a relevant subject line.
>
> Tim, just curious, who 'owns' a thread?
-
