It probably got better. ;)
Rick not+a+Linux+basher Hightower
-Original Message-
From: Jon Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:49 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [jug-discussion] eclipse on win2k
I had no problem with netbeans
Thomas Hicks wrote:
> On that topic, would anyone like to suggest
> their favorite Eclipse resource sites that might help beginners?
Thomas,
Can't help on the Linux questions, but here are some good sites to look at:
The Eclipse home page (http://www.eclipse.org/) actually contains a lot
of
At 10:37 AM 6/24/2002 -0700, Rick wrote:
>Thomas Hicks comes out of his corner and throws a looping overhead left.
>Pop. Eclipse is down. Sorry... just saw the new Ali movie...
:)))
>Can you get NetBeans to work under Linux? If not, what do you use now?
Yea, the latest NetBeans seems to work f
I had no problem with netbeans and linux
-Original Message-
From: Rick Hightower [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] eclipse on win2k
Thomas Hicks comes out of his corner and throws a looping overhead left
I have it working under Linux but you need to use the motif version.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] eclipse on win2k
At 05:54 AM 6/24/2002 -0700, you wrote
I've had the motif version working with real motif (openmotif.org). It's
got the nasty motif feel though.
-Original Message-
From: Randolph S. Kahle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] eclipse on
On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 10:30, Thomas Hicks wrote:
> At 05:54 AM 6/24/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>
> >Bottom line for me is that there is "no comparison" between the two
> >IDEs. I've switch to Eclipse, even from JBuilder.
>
> Praise, praise, praisebut has anyone out there gotten this
> thing to w
surprise me that you are having problems with Eclipse
and Linux.
Rick Hightower
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] eclipse on win2k
> At 05:54 AM 6
At 05:54 AM 6/24/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Bottom line for me is that there is "no comparison" between the two
>IDEs. I've switch to Eclipse, even from JBuilder.
Praise, praise, praisebut has anyone out there gotten this
thing to work under Linux? I tried...I took the binary version
that clai
. Kahle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 5:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] eclipse on win2k
Warner,
My assessment is that Eclipse has an architectural design that is much
better that NetBeans.
I have looked at the difference between building a NetB
Warner,
My assessment is that Eclipse has an architectural design that is much
better that NetBeans.
I have looked at the difference between building a NetBean and Eclipse
"add-in". Eclipse is far superior in vision, design, and engineering.
That coupled with the component set design and implem
11 matches
Mail list logo
