Incoming thread necromancy Have we come to a general consensus on adding a new flag for "maintainers" to list multiple maintainers, and leave "maintainer" in place?
What kind of implications does this have when someone adds themselves to "maintainers" with a "maintainer" left in the metadata? are they a sub maintainer? I'd like to have a clearly defined agreed upon request so I can file the bug and champion its resolution. While its not mission critical, I fear this will go stale if we don't move on it soon. On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Joshua Strobl <truthfroml...@gmail.com>wrote: > I think the use of "maintainers" rather than "maintainer" would be > appropriate. Would we use it in both instances of a single and multiple > maintainers, check for both when doing a charm proof, have charm proof > set the use of "maintainer" as opposed to "maintainer" as a warning that > gets outputted, etc. > > On 03/03/2014 04:45 PM, Marco Ceppi wrote: > > Should maintainer be renamed to > > maintainers to match the rest of the potentially plural options? > > -- > Juju mailing list > Juju@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju >
-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
