[Review Queue] cleaning house, nagios, zookeeper

2015-02-27 Thread Kevin Monroe
Hi folks, Amir, Cory, and I had a delightful time in the queue today: + cleaning house Nicolás (~nicopace) did a great job adding new tests to lots of charms. These were originally submitted as individual Merge Proposals, but later consolidated into a single MP per charm. This decreased the

New Error With juju-deployer

2015-02-27 Thread Kevin Sargent
Suddenly all my deploys stopped working with following errormessage:   Traceback (most recent call last):   File"/usr/bin/juju-deployer", line 9, in    load_entry_point('juju-deployer==0.4.3', 'console_scripts','juju-deployer')()   File"/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/deployer/cli.py", line

Re: juju devel 1.22-beta4 is available for testing.

2015-02-27 Thread Curtis Hovey-Canonical
All published. The source and signed data are now in agreement. On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote: >>> ahh. The json was not signed! The signed json is from the previous >>> release. We will look into this now. I will reply with an update soon. > > We queued the resign

Re: unit-get and ipv6 addresses

2015-02-27 Thread Dimiter Naydenov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jake, Can you provide some more information: - - your environments.yaml file - - machine-0.log, machine-1.log, and machine-2.log from /var/log/juju/ on each machine Before sending these, please make a quick check to remove any sensitive info from t

unit-get and ipv6 addresses

2015-02-27 Thread Jake Kugel
Hi, I am using juju 1.21.1-trusty-i386 and deploying to a manual environment, and had a problem deploying wordpress following the getting started page here [1]. When I tried to view wordpress with a browser it gave me an "Error establishing a database connection", and from a little bit of dig

Re: juju devel 1.22-beta4 is available for testing.

2015-02-27 Thread Curtis Hovey-Canonical
>> Index2 was updated on Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:09:44 + >> and the devel product file on Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:09:44 + >> >> ahh. The json was not signed! The signed json is from the previous >> release. We will look into this now. I will reply with an update soon. We queued the resigning. The

Re: FOSDEM 2015 - Juju Talk is now online!

2015-02-27 Thread Sebastian
Awesome talk! thanks for share :) Em Wed Feb 25 2015 at 9:03:59 PM, David Cheney escreveu: > Nice work Chuck! > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:47 AM, Charles Butler > wrote: > > If you missed out on FOSDEM 2015 and the awesomeness of the Configuration > > Management room talks, don't fret! The vid

Re: juju devel 1.22-beta4 is available for testing.

2015-02-27 Thread Jason Hobbs
No - I can browse to the sjson file and there is no 1.22-beta4 entry. It does show up in the .json file though.. Jason On 02/27/2015 12:34 PM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote: > Could caching be an issue? > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Ryan Beisner > wrote: >> Ditto, also seeing that. >> >>

Re: juju devel 1.22-beta4 is available for testing.

2015-02-27 Thread Curtis Hovey-Canonical
Could caching be an issue? On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Ryan Beisner wrote: > Ditto, also seeing that. > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Jason Hobbs > wrote: ... Thanks,https://streams.canonical.com/juju/tools/streams/v1/com.ubuntu.juju:devel:tools.sjson >> >> or >> >> >> https://streams

Re: juju devel 1.22-beta4 is available for testing.

2015-02-27 Thread Ryan Beisner
Ditto, also seeing that. On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Jason Hobbs wrote: > Hi Curtis, > > On 02/26/2015 01:47 PM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote: > > juju-core 1.22-beta4 > > > > Development releases use the 'devel' simple-streams. You must configure > > the 'agent-stream' option in your envi

Re: juju devel 1.22-beta4 is available for testing.

2015-02-27 Thread Jason Hobbs
Hi Curtis, On 02/26/2015 01:47 PM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote: > juju-core 1.22-beta4 > > Development releases use the 'devel' simple-streams. You must configure > the 'agent-stream' option in your environments.yaml to use the matching > juju agents. > > agent-stream: devel There don't se

Re: Memory constraints and lxc containers

2015-02-27 Thread Edward Hope-Morley
Maybe this can help (thanks to Serge): The simplest way is to use cgm getvalue memory '' memory.usage_in_bytes as that only requires cgmanager on the host and in the container. You can also use lxcfs. You can use it on trusty, but it requires having ppa:ubuntu-lxc/daily. You'd do su

Memory constraints and lxc containers

2015-02-27 Thread Stuart Bishop
Hi. I've seen several bug reports and workarounds for charms that need to tune memory settings, which tends to fail horribly when using the local provider or deploying to lxc containers. It seems to be impossible to infer how much RAM a service should be using. The end result is extra configuratio