Juju terminology change: controllers and models

Hey all As has been mentioned previously in this list, for the Juju 2.0 release we have been working on fundamental terminology changes. In particular, we now talk about controllers and models instead of state servers and environments. To this end, a rather large change has landed in master and

Re: Juju terminology change: controllers and models

Yeah, there's a couple of places that need a bit of cleanup. With that one, I needed to double check existing call points before deleting, and ran out of time before needing to do the merge. But the intent is to delete it. On 03/02/16 12:53, Nate Finch wrote: > FYI, I noticed

Re: Overlay network for Juju LXC containers?

Andrew and I took a look at this yesterday. Digital Ocean don't support DHCP for private addresses, which is unfortunate because if they did this would just work with Juju 2.0 and with a feature flag for Juju 1.5. For this reason we need our own overlay network. Unfortunately we have been overly

Re: Overlay network for Juju LXC containers?

Thank you very much for this! This confirmed my suspicion; the only way I got it to work on a manual provider was to change the lxcbr0 interface so it connects to an internal network with a dhcp server. I didn't look to deeply into the code so I wasn't sure if there wasn't a better way...

Re: Installing 2.0

Ta On 2 Feb 2016 12:01, "Tim Van Steenburgh" wrote: > 1. ppa:juju/devel > 2. Use the layer! > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Tom Barber > wrote: > >> Morning folks, >> >> What was the PPA for Juju 2.0? >> >> On a separate note, if

Re: Installing 2.0

1. ppa:juju/devel 2. Use the layer! On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Tom Barber wrote: > Morning folks, > > What was the PPA for Juju 2.0? > > On a separate note, if I'm writing a charm to install a Java based package > should I use layers to include openjdk from

Query on IBM-Installtion Manger Charm Layer

Hello Team, I am working on IBM-Installation Manager charm and I will be developing this charm from layers . i have explored on layers and thought to use basic layer which is present in "http://interface.juju.com " but not sure about it ?? Could you please suggest me which layer and

Re: Juju terminology change: controllers and models

Very exciting to see these bits landing now! I'm looking forward to the alpha and trying out all the commands On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:05 AM Ian Booth wrote: > Yeah, there's a couple of places that need a bit of cleanup. With that > one, I > needed to double check

Re: Juju terminology change: controllers and models

FYI, I noticed ServiceDeployWithNetworks still exists as a client and facade method, but it's only called by tests. Maybe it should be removed? On Tue, Feb 2, 2016, 8:34 PM Ian Booth wrote: > Hey all > > As has been mentioned previously in this list, for the Juju 2.0