Re: Upgrading charms to 16.01 - Ceph

2016-02-03 Thread James Page
Hi Darryl On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 at 00:39 Darryl Weaver wrote: > This would therefore have implications for co-locating nova-compute with > ceph charms on physical nodes. > Upgrading nova-compute would update the apt repository regardless of what > the ceph charm is doing. > Yes - this is one of th

Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread James Page
Hi All I've been using Juju 2.0 (built from source with an in-flight patch for LXD 2.0 right now - but that should be resolved soon) with the local LXD provider on Ubuntu Xenial development to test some work we've been doing to get OpenStack running on-top of LXD in a single machine. That's now w

Re: Problem deploying a bundle

2016-02-03 Thread Adam Stokes
You'll need to update your revisions in the bundle file. We ran into this problem as well yesterday and it has to deal with charmhelpers regex when matching package_names -> openstack_versions. On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote: > Hi, > > I've created my own openstack bundle

Re: Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 03/02/16 12:09, James Page wrote: > juju create-model midonet-review > juju switch midonet-review Thanks for the feedback James, it's great to see these bits coming together so nicely :) Should we automatically switch to a new model when you create it? I suspect the common case is create-m

Re: Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread Jorge O. Castro
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:09 PM, James Page wrote: > Hope people find that all useful! Indeed, we also have fresh documentation thanks to Peter Matulis. I've been using these all week to spin up on lxd and juju: https://jujucharms.com/docs/devel/config-LXD As always everyone please feel free to

Re: Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread Antonio Rosales
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:09 PM, James Page wrote: > Hi All > > I've been using Juju 2.0 (built from source with an in-flight patch for LXD > 2.0 right now - but that should be resolved soon) with the local LXD > provider on Ubuntu Xenial development to test some work we've been doing to > get Open

Re: Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread Louis Bouchard
Hi, Le 03/02/2016 14:23, Mark Shuttleworth a écrit : > On 03/02/16 12:09, James Page wrote: >> juju create-model midonet-review >> juju switch midonet-review > > Thanks for the feedback James, it's great to see these bits coming > together so nicely :) > > Should we automatically switch to a

Re: Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread James Page
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 at 13:23 Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 03/02/16 12:09, James Page wrote: > > juju create-model midonet-review > > juju switch midonet-review > > Thanks for the feedback James, it's great to see these bits coming > together so nicely :) > > Should we automatically switch to

Re: Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread Rick Harding
Yes it's intended to auto switch for you. If it does not we need to correct it. On Wed, Feb 3, 2016, 2:49 PM James Page wrote: > On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 at 13:23 Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > >> On 03/02/16 12:09, James Page wrote: >> > juju create-model midonet-review >> > juju switch midonet-revi

Re: Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread Marco Ceppi
I think in 2.0-alpha1 it does not, but as James mentioned he's running a little closer to alpha2/alpha3 version (from master) which appears to implement this so it's just a matter of alpha software is alpha :) On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:20 AM Rick Harding wrote: > Yes it's intended to auto switch

Re: Problem deploying a bundle

2016-02-03 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
Hi, On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 at 22:55 James Page wrote: > Hi Pshem > > {cut} >> > > Why are they failing now? And the more important question - how do I make >> it work again? Do I have to upgrade my bundle file to use the new charms? >> > > Yes - use the new charms in the charm store with Liberty ra

Re: Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread Tim Penhey
On 04/02/16 02:23, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 03/02/16 12:09, James Page wrote: >> juju create-model midonet-review >> juju switch midonet-review > > Thanks for the feedback James, it's great to see these bits coming > together so nicely :) > > Should we automatically switch to a new model