Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

On 07/10/16 13:59, Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote: > Tell the juju controller to use devel streams. Eg, to upgrade my own > deployment, I I set the streams to devel, then upgrade the controller > than the hosted model. Guys, there should be no devel streams in 2.0. One stream, with all releases,

Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

On 07/10/16 13:59, Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote: > Tell the juju controller to use devel streams. Eg, to upgrade my own > deployment, I I set the streams to devel, then upgrade the controller > than the hosted model. Guys, there should be no devel streams in 2.0. One stream, with all releases,

Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

On 07/10/16 11:49, Adam Israel wrote: > One potential way to display the information, using existing > whitespace so we're not changing the overall layout. > > http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23290044/ Yeah, I like that, Though I would do it as: Unit (*leader) Workload ... If we're touching that

Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

On 07/10/16 11:49, Adam Israel wrote: > One potential way to display the information, using existing > whitespace so we're not changing the overall layout. > > http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23290044/ Yeah, I like that, Though I would do it as: Unit (*leader) Workload ... If we're touching that

Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

Thanks Curtis! following your steps and setting the agent-stream=devel, I was able to upgrade the controller and default models to rc3 Matt On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote: > Hi Matt, > > You, and several of us, are victims of '"upload-tools

Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

Hi Matt, You, and several of us, are victims of '"upload-tools strikes back" cannot upgrade with streams' https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1631529 On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Matt Rae wrote: > Hi, I'm testing an upgrade between juju 2.0 rc2 and rc3. > > Should

Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

Hi Matt, You, and several of us, are victims of '"upload-tools strikes back" cannot upgrade with streams' https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1631529 On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Matt Rae wrote: > Hi, I'm testing an upgrade between juju 2.0 rc2 and rc3. > > Should

Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

One potential way to display the information, using existing whitespace so we're not changing the overall layout. http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23290044/ On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:52 AM Adam Israel wrote: > That's a great piece of information to relay to the user. Is

Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

One potential way to display the information, using existing whitespace so we're not changing the overall layout. http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23290044/ On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:52 AM Adam Israel wrote: > That's a great piece of information to relay to the user. Is

Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

> A new development release of Juju, 2.0-rc3, is here! ... > ## How do I get it? You can now install the Juju 2.0-rc3 snap. snap install juju --beta --devmode ^ This is the 2.0-rc3. Juju requires requires confinement: devmode, which restricts our RCs and stables to the beta channel :( --

Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

Hi, I'm testing an upgrade between juju 2.0 rc2 and rc3. Should 'juju upgrade-juju -m default' upgrade to rc3? So far I'm seeing 'no upgrades available' $ juju model-config agent-version 2.0-rc2 $ juju --version 2.0-rc3-xenial-amd64 $ juju upgrade-juju no upgrades available $ juju upgrade-juju

Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

That's a great piece of information to relay to the user. Is there a way we can better communicate what it represents in the tabular status output? On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:08 AM Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 07/10/16 09:58, Adam Israel wrote: > > It looks like rc3 introduced

Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

Hi, I'm testing an upgrade between juju 2.0 rc2 and rc3. Should 'juju upgrade-juju -m default' upgrade to rc3? So far I'm seeing 'no upgrades available' $ juju model-config agent-version 2.0-rc2 $ juju --version 2.0-rc3-xenial-amd64 $ juju upgrade-juju no upgrades available $ juju upgrade-juju

Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

On 07/10/16 09:58, Adam Israel wrote: > It looks like rc3 introduced a minor change in the status output. Each > unit has an asterisk next to its name, i.e., mariadb/0* (full output > in pastebin). What is the asterisk meant to represent? > > http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23289710/ I believe thats

Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

On 07/10/16 09:58, Adam Israel wrote: > It looks like rc3 introduced a minor change in the status output. Each > unit has an asterisk next to its name, i.e., mariadb/0* (full output > in pastebin). What is the asterisk meant to represent? > > http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23289710/ I believe thats

Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

It indicates that that unit is the leader for the application. It's a bit academic in the status you pasted, since each application only has one unit, but I can see it being useful if you had scaled out a bit. Cheers, Christian On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:59 PM Adam Israel

Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

It indicates that that unit is the leader for the application. It's a bit academic in the status you pasted, since each application only has one unit, but I can see it being useful if you had scaled out a bit. Cheers, Christian On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:59 PM Adam Israel

Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

It looks like rc3 introduced a minor change in the status output. Each unit has an asterisk next to its name, i.e., mariadb/0* (full output in pastebin). What is the asterisk meant to represent? http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23289710/ On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 5:28 PM Andrew Wilkins

Re: Juju 2.0-rc3 is here!

It looks like rc3 introduced a minor change in the status output. Each unit has an asterisk next to its name, i.e., mariadb/0* (full output in pastebin). What is the asterisk meant to represent? http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23289710/ On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 5:28 PM Andrew Wilkins

Upgrading to VPC on AWS

Hi folks My AWS account pre-dates VPCs, so I didn't have one by default. I've now added one, how can I update my credential / controller to make use of it by default? Mark -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Re: Canonical Distribution of Kubernetes - Update Release Notes (16.10 cycle)

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:13 PM Adam Stokes wrote: > Nice! One question though maybe I'm missing something but I didn't see > where the conjure-up instructions were shown on the jujucharms.com page? > https://jujucharms.com/canonical-kubernetes/ It is in the README

Re: Upcoming changes for the ec2 provider

On 06/10/16 16:33, Andrew Wilkins wrote: > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:26 AM Mark Shuttleworth > wrote: > > On 06/10/16 16:14, Andrew Wilkins wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:30 PM Rick Harding >>