Re: database-relation-join not invoked

2017-05-25 Thread John Meinel
It depends if your hook goes into 'error' state or 'blocked'. Error should generally be avoided because it is a signal to Juju that you can no longer make forward progress (generally meant to mean there is a logic bug/typo/etc in your charm). With Error Juju may retry the hook that failed but it

Re: Call for testers: preview of persistent storage support

2017-05-25 Thread Andrew Wilkins
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 11:26 AM Patrizio Bassi wrote: > Dear Andrew, > what about private clouds such as maas? > MAAS is a bit special, because the disks are physically attached to the machines. If and when we support something like Ceph RBD natively inside Juju,

Re: Call for testers: preview of persistent storage support

2017-05-25 Thread Andrew Wilkins
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 11:26 AM Patrizio Bassi wrote: > Dear Andrew, > what about private clouds such as maas? > MAAS is a bit special, because the disks are physically attached to the machines. If and when we support something like Ceph RBD natively inside Juju,

Re: Call for testers: preview of persistent storage support

2017-05-25 Thread Patrizio Bassi
Dear Andrew, what about private clouds such as maas? Patrizio Il giorno mer 24 ma 2017 alle 03:38 Andrew Wilkins < andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> ha scritto: > Hi folks, > > One of the things we're working on for the 2.3 release (not 2.2!) is > persistent storage. What this means is the ability

Weekly Development Summary

2017-05-25 Thread Andrew Wilkins
Hi all, It's been a busy week as we continue towards the 2.2-rc1 release. As Tim said earlier in the week, the release will slip to next week as we continue ironing out the kinks. One of the main things we've been focusing on this week is improving scalability and resilience in large deployments,

Re: database-relation-join not invoked

2017-05-25 Thread Tim Van Steenburgh
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Giuseppe Attardi wrote: > I have written a charm for OpenStack Gnocchi. > The service requires a postgresql database relation. > > The start hook fails, of course, because the relation is not set. > > I expected that, but I expected

database-relation-join not invoked

2017-05-25 Thread Giuseppe Attardi
I have written a charm for OpenStack Gnocchi. The service requires a postgresql database relation. The start hook fails, of course, because the relation is not set. I expected that, but I expected that when I issue juju add-relation gnocchi postgresql:db it will invoke the

Re: Migrating charmhelpers to github

2017-05-25 Thread Merlijn Sebrechts
A big +1! Launchpad was the reason why I didn't yet contribute to charmhelpers.. 2017-05-25 14:57 GMT+02:00 James Page : > Hi Charmers > > There has been a bubbling undercurrent of desire to move charmhelpers code > hosting out of bazaar on Launchpad to git on github,com

Re: Migrating charmhelpers to github

2017-05-25 Thread Charles Butler
+1 from me as well. I'll take webhook automation for the win, Alex. All the best, Charles On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 7:58 AM James Page wrote: > Hi Charmers > > There has been a bubbling undercurrent of desire to move charmhelpers code > hosting out of bazaar on Launchpad

Re: Migrating charmhelpers to github

2017-05-25 Thread Tim Van Steenburgh
+1 from me, especially since James is volunteering. :D Thanks for getting this ball rolling! On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:57 AM, James Page wrote: > Hi Charmers > > There has been a bubbling undercurrent of desire to move charmhelpers code > hosting out of bazaar on

Re: Migrating charmhelpers to github

2017-05-25 Thread Alex Kavanagh
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Adam Collard wrote: > On Thu, 25 May 2017 at 14:14 Alex Kavanagh > wrote: > >> Hi James >> >> I'm a big +1 to this idea, but with one tiny reservation: I have a >> rather large merge-proposal regarding a

Re: Migrating charmhelpers to github

2017-05-25 Thread Adam Collard
On Thu, 25 May 2017 at 14:14 Alex Kavanagh wrote: > Hi James > > I'm a big +1 to this idea, but with one tiny reservation: I have a rather > large merge-proposal regarding a refactor of the hosts + ports fetch bug + > refactor of the fetch code. It would be nice to

Re: Migrating charmhelpers to github

2017-05-25 Thread Alex Kavanagh
Hi James I'm a big +1 to this idea, but with one tiny reservation: I have a rather large merge-proposal regarding a refactor of the hosts + ports fetch bug + refactor of the fetch code. It would be nice to get that in first (but that's purely personal!) However, we'll lose the history of the

Migrating charmhelpers to github

2017-05-25 Thread James Page
Hi Charmers There has been a bubbling undercurrent of desire to move charmhelpers code hosting out of bazaar on Launchpad to git on github,com alongside other charm ecosystem development tooling. I'd like to get the code migrated over ASAP and then we can start enabling automatic PR testing and