Re: call for testing: relations across Juju models

2017-07-24 Thread Dmitrii Shcherbakov
Hi Patrizio, As far as I understand it now, if you configure it right in terms of networking, it will be possible for both single and multi-cloud cases. Having only workers on the second cloud is fairly straightforward. However, I think the real use-case is to implement k8s federation without ha

Re: call for testing: relations across Juju models

2017-07-24 Thread Patrizio Bassi
Hi All this is very very interesting. Is possibile to scale out some units using cross models? For instance: in a onpestack tenant i deploy a kubernates cluster. Than in another tenant i add k8-workers, the add-unit command will refer to the parent deployment to get needed params (i.e. master IP

Re: call for testing: relations across Juju models

2017-07-24 Thread Ian Booth
On 24/07/17 23:12, Ian Booth wrote: > > > On 24/07/17 20:02, Paul Gear wrote: >> On 08/07/17 03:36, Rick Harding wrote: >>> As I noted in The Juju Show [1] this week I've put together a blog >>> post around the cross model relations feature that folks can test out >>> in Juju 2.2. Please test i

Re: call for testing: relations across Juju models

2017-07-24 Thread Ian Booth
On 24/07/17 20:02, Paul Gear wrote: > On 08/07/17 03:36, Rick Harding wrote: >> As I noted in The Juju Show [1] this week I've put together a blog >> post around the cross model relations feature that folks can test out >> in Juju 2.2. Please test it out and provide your feedback. >> >> http://m

Re: call for testing: relations across Juju models

2017-07-24 Thread Paul Gear
On 08/07/17 03:36, Rick Harding wrote: > As I noted in The Juju Show [1] this week I've put together a blog > post around the cross model relations feature that folks can test out > in Juju 2.2. Please test it out and provide your feedback. > > http://mitechie.com/blog/2017/7/7/call-for-testing-sh