Re: juju 2.0 and vmware

2016-10-24 Thread Horacio Duran
This is how mine looks clouds: vsphere: type: vsphere auth-types: [userpass] endpoint: regions: dc0: {} On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Peter Petrakis wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Horacio Duran > wrote: > > Chance seems to be in the righ

Re: juju 2.0 and vmware

2016-10-24 Thread Horacio Duran
Beware, current release has a bug that might affect you where many connections are open and never closed to the vcenter, it is being worked as we speak and will most likely be included in the next release, sorry for that. On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Horacio Duran wrote: > Chance seems

Re: juju 2.0 and vmware

2016-10-24 Thread Horacio Duran
Chance seems to be in the right path there. In the example "dc0" is the name of our data center, to figure out yours you can access the vsphere web client and in there go to: Home->Vcenter inventory lists->Resources->Datacenters (all this in the left tree like menu) And you will be presented with

Re: about to land a breaking change

2016-06-21 Thread Horacio Duran
This just landed fyi. On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Horacio Duran wrote: > I am about to land a change in the way we persist user permissions in juju > core master, this will not change API but existing models/controllers will > stop working so please be aware of this before pu

about to land a breaking change

2016-06-21 Thread Horacio Duran
I am about to land a change in the way we persist user permissions in juju core master, this will not change API but existing models/controllers will stop working so please be aware of this before pulling the latest version of the code and trying to upgrade to it. Cheers and sorry for the inconveni

Re: LXD v2.0.0-rc8 does not work with Juju v2.0-beta3

2016-04-06 Thread Horacio Duran
yes, that workaround works, also you can change /etc/default/lxd-bridge and restart the lxd-bridge service. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Casey Marshall wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Alexis Bruemmer < > alexis.bruem...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi All, >> >> As recently highligh