Quoting Dmitrii Shcherbakov (dmitrii.shcherba...@canonical.com):
> Hi Serge,
>
> >From my perspective Juju will continue getting more support for vSphere
> provider as VMware is used by some customers that do not want to go with a
> full-blown bare-metal deployment and just have spare VMs.
Ok, th
n me. Thats how i work ;-)
>
> BR
>
>
>
> Christian
>
> Quoting "Serge E. Hallyn" :
>
> >Quoting christian.set...@freies-franken.org
> >(christian.set...@freies-franken.org):
> >>Hi
> >>
> >>6.0 should work. It doe
Quoting christian.set...@freies-franken.org
(christian.set...@freies-franken.org):
> Hi
>
> 6.0 should work. It does for me and even 6.5.
Ok - like I say I only have the one 6.0 so not ideal, but a starting
point.
> I already have offered the devs that they can use my environment to
> sort out
Hi,
I've inherited a few vsphere machines where I was hoping to use juju
to fire off openstack etc. I've been trying to use the vsphere
provider (which I was excited to see existed), but am seeing a few
inconsistencies, so had a few questions.
The first blunt question - is this going to be a mai
; >> path: /
> >> type: disk
> >> ephemeral: false
> >>
> >>
> >> juju bootstrap now seems to run fine without remounting the kernel debug.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your help!
> >>
> >> Tom
> >>
> >&g
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 09:45:14AM +, Tom Barber wrote:
> Hi Serge
>
> I rebooted the host to see what happened and the lxc images that were
> running fine all now have broken SSHD. This, to make absolutely clear
> doesn't affect the Xenial image, just the trusty one I test with.
>
> bugg@tom
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:42:51PM +, Tom Barber wrote:
> Okay I think I worked it out, but i dont' cause the cause in reality:
>
> in upstart mountall was failing during the boot of the containers
>
> so I did:
>
> root@tomsdevbox ~ # umount /sys/kernel/debug
> root@tomsdevbox ~ # mount -t
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 02:42:51PM +, Tom Barber wrote:
> Afternoon, got bored decided to try Jorge's blog post about Juju LXD and ZFS
>
> I'd read on a few posts about the requirement for LXD beta2 because of API
> incompatibilities so I found the deb's and installed them.
>
> Its up and run
Quoting Kapil Thangavelu (kapil.thangav...@canonical.com):
> Hi Folks,
>
> instructions on getting a speedy workflow with local provider (a container
> per second)
Hey Kapil,
sounds interesting - but I don't see a link? Is it hidden in plain
sight?
> with juju's builtin local provider (running
Quoting Andreas Hasenack (andr...@canonical.com):
> Hi,
>
> I have an instance on openstack (canonistack) that got a floating ip, and
> that address is now showing as public-address. I guess that's ok.
>
> Except it's not reachable via ssh anymore (nor juju ssh). For some reason
> (bug? deploymen
Quoting rha...@informatiq.org (rha...@informatiq.org):
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Serge E. Hallyn
> wrote:
...
> >> >Which kind of fits in to how I've thought juju and docker
> >>relate. You
> >> >might first want to use docker o
Quoting rha...@informatiq.org (rha...@informatiq.org):
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Serge E. Hallyn
> wrote:
> >Quoting Ramez Hanna (rha...@informatiq.org):
> >> Hi,
> >> this is a quick braindump of my thoughts related to docker
> >>l
I'm told that's for a network (veth nic?) performance issue? FWIW
my main build+test box is running on 3.2 precise kernel with
ubuntu-lxc daily ppa. overlayfs and lvm clones work perfectly out
of the box, and btrfs (which i'm using now) only have the fsync
performance issue, which I work around b
13 matches
Mail list logo
