Re: Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread Tim Penhey
On 04/02/16 02:23, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 03/02/16 12:09, James Page wrote: >> juju create-model midonet-review >> juju switch midonet-review > > Thanks for the feedback James, it's great to see these bits coming > together so nicely :) > > Should we automatically switch to a new model

Re: Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread Marco Ceppi
I think in 2.0-alpha1 it does not, but as James mentioned he's running a little closer to alpha2/alpha3 version (from master) which appears to implement this so it's just a matter of alpha software is alpha :) On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:20 AM Rick Harding wrote: > Yes it's intended to auto switch

Re: Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread Rick Harding
Yes it's intended to auto switch for you. If it does not we need to correct it. On Wed, Feb 3, 2016, 2:49 PM James Page wrote: > On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 at 13:23 Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > >> On 03/02/16 12:09, James Page wrote: >> > juju create-model midonet-review >> > juju switch midonet-revi

Re: Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread James Page
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 at 13:23 Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 03/02/16 12:09, James Page wrote: > > juju create-model midonet-review > > juju switch midonet-review > > Thanks for the feedback James, it's great to see these bits coming > together so nicely :) > > Should we automatically switch to

Re: Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread Louis Bouchard
Hi, Le 03/02/2016 14:23, Mark Shuttleworth a écrit : > On 03/02/16 12:09, James Page wrote: >> juju create-model midonet-review >> juju switch midonet-review > > Thanks for the feedback James, it's great to see these bits coming > together so nicely :) > > Should we automatically switch to a

Re: Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread Antonio Rosales
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:09 PM, James Page wrote: > Hi All > > I've been using Juju 2.0 (built from source with an in-flight patch for LXD > 2.0 right now - but that should be resolved soon) with the local LXD > provider on Ubuntu Xenial development to test some work we've been doing to > get Open

Re: Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread Jorge O. Castro
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:09 PM, James Page wrote: > Hope people find that all useful! Indeed, we also have fresh documentation thanks to Peter Matulis. I've been using these all week to spin up on lxd and juju: https://jujucharms.com/docs/devel/config-LXD As always everyone please feel free to

Re: Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 03/02/16 12:09, James Page wrote: > juju create-model midonet-review > juju switch midonet-review Thanks for the feedback James, it's great to see these bits coming together so nicely :) Should we automatically switch to a new model when you create it? I suspect the common case is create-m

Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

2016-02-03 Thread James Page
Hi All I've been using Juju 2.0 (built from source with an in-flight patch for LXD 2.0 right now - but that should be resolved soon) with the local LXD provider on Ubuntu Xenial development to test some work we've been doing to get OpenStack running on-top of LXD in a single machine. That's now w