Re: Juju 2.1-beta5 is here

2017-02-05 Thread Narinder Gupta
Thank you john "": internal-api option help me putting my application with lxd in internal-api network. In that way i can control the applications interface where i want to. I am hoping we will be documenting this knowledge somewhere? Thanks and Regards, Narinder Gupta (PMP) nari

Re: Juju 2.1-beta5 is here

2017-02-04 Thread John Meinel
You're using local charms (./xenial/mongodb) so it's hard to know for sure exactly what you're deploying without having the full set of files. If it is the same as the "official" mongodb: https://jujucharms.com/mongodb/ Then it has several bindings that aren't listed in your bundle. Your bundle st

Re: Juju 2.1-beta5 is here

2017-02-04 Thread Narinder Gupta
Well this mongodb charm have not changed since trusty. I doubt that binding have been defined for this charm. So I think mechanism to define a default binding for the application where binding is not defined in charms. Also opnfv-promise application does not have any api to consume so here also me

Re: Juju 2.1-beta5 is here

2017-02-04 Thread Rick Harding
Narinder, so the beta5 includes the container networking changes that are required to help make sure that Juju stops guessing bindings incorrectly. If you look at the error messages in those commands you can see a new error that the beta5 presents: message: 'unable to setup network: no o

Re: Juju 2.1-beta5 is here

2017-02-04 Thread Narinder Gupta
Here you go. juju status --format yaml http://paste.ubuntu.com/23927017/ juju show-machine 0 http://paste.ubuntu.com/23927020/ pastebinit bundles.yaml http://paste.ubuntu.com/23927027/ Thanks and Regards, Narinder Gupta (PMP) narinder.gu...@canonical.com Canonical, Ltd.

Re: Juju 2.1-beta5 is here

2017-02-04 Thread Rick Harding
Narinder, can you share the output of juju status --format=yaml and juju show-machine 0 On Sat, Feb 4, 2017, 5:15 AM Narinder Gupta wrote: > Hi Nicholas, > I am finding issues when do the deployment. Bundle i used to deploy with > juju 2.1-beta4 does not get deployed with juju-2.1-beta5. > > Rea

Re: Juju 2.1-beta5 is here

2017-02-04 Thread Narinder Gupta
Hi Nicholas, I am finding issues when do the deployment. Bundle i used to deploy with juju 2.1-beta4 does not get deployed with juju-2.1-beta5. Reason of that is mongodb lxd container still waiting to get machine which was not the case for juju 2.1-beta4 mongodb/0 waiting allo

Juju 2.1-beta5 is here

2017-02-03 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
The Juju team would like to introduce Juju and conjure-up 2.1-beta5! The most visible changes are to container networking and that juju controllers now expose Prometheus metrics over an HTTPS endpoint. Finally, conjure-up is also a snap, provides juju, and can be installed on trusty as a snap a