On 22/09/14 15:08, Michael Schwartz wrote:
> Agreed. There is only one page on Azure, so it would be nice if there
> was a note that said
> "Don't waste your time... Azure isn't working today."
Or better, Juju automatically checks a cloud weather report which we
publish that tells you this definit
On 22/09/14 15:06, Mark Ramm-Christensen (Canonical.com) wrote:
> I think we need to make sure that we do the best error reporting we can, so
> if Juju isn't working because of Azure issues, we should find some way to
> let users know that so that they can try another cloud, contact microsoft,
> or
Michael,
I read the title of this email and my heart sank a little. This reminds me
that we are still moving forward at break neck speed and what ground we've
covered and stepped into the next chapter may not be completely solid for
someone without the experiences that I have myself. When you wor
Agreed. There is only one page on Azure, so it would be nice if there
was a note that said
"Don't waste your time... Azure isn't working today."
- Mike
On 2014-09-22 09:06, Mark Ramm-Christensen (Canonical.com) wrote:
I think we need to make sure that we do the best error reporting we
can,
I think we need to make sure that we do the best error reporting we can, so
if Juju isn't working because of Azure issues, we should find some way to
let users know that so that they can try another cloud, contact microsoft,
or otherwise find another way forward.
--Mark Ramm
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014
Juju,
The note I got from Nate on Azure is below (after wasting a day trying
to get it working...)
At OSCON, I worked with Jorge and even he couldn't get my local VM
working, but I'm willing to give it a try again. I'd be willing to
schedule a meeting (please email me off the list to schedul
enhey wrote:
> On 22/09/14 03:29, Michael Schwartz wrote:
>>
>> Guys,
>>
>> I hate to break this to you, but deploying and managing Juju is still
>> too hard and too unreliable.
>>
>> I hear this in the market, and my own experience confirms it. The two
&g
On 22/09/14 03:29, Michael Schwartz wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
> I hate to break this to you, but deploying and managing Juju is still
> too hard and too unreliable.
>
> I hear this in the market, and my own experience confirms it. The two
> times I tried, once on my local s
Guys,
I hate to break this to you, but deploying and managing Juju is still
too hard and too unreliable.
I hear this in the market, and my own experience confirms it. The two
times I tried, once on my local system, once on Azure, it didn't work.
My Juju t-shirt lists Azure first,
