Re: Manual provisioning - feedback wanted

2013-09-25 Thread Andrew Wilkins
Matt, Thanks for doing some more testing. So, short story is, manual provisioning needs some more work to work with existing providers. The manually provisioned node thinks it's running an ec2-provider instance. Thus, it tries to do ec2isms, like querying 169.254.169.254 for instance metadata

Re: Manual provisioning - feedback wanted

2013-09-15 Thread Matthew Williams
Sounds like a cool feature. I tried bootstrapping in aws then adding a machine supplied by digital ocean. I got an invalid domain error. Any idea what I was doing wrong? juju add-machine -v ssh:root@162.243.10.110 2013-09-15 20:06:07 INFO juju.provider.ec2 ec2.go:187 opening environment amazon

Re: Manual provisioning - feedback wanted

2013-09-15 Thread Andrew Wilkins
Hi Matt, It looks like a bug with address resolution. IF you have a DNS entry for your digital ocean box, please try using that in the ssh:... target. I'll try and reproduce the issue later - I've logged a bug for now. Cheers, Andrew On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Matthew Williams

Re: Manual provisioning - feedback wanted

2013-09-10 Thread Andreas Hasenack
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Andrew Wilkins andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote: $ sudo $(which juju) bootstrap $ juju status environment: local machines: 0: agent-state: started agent-version: 1.15.0.1 dns-name: 10.0.3.1 instance-id: localhost series: raring

Re: Manual provisioning - feedback wanted

2013-09-08 Thread David Cheney
As of 1.13.3 you can now do this: juju add-machine ssh:[user@]host * Does this user have to be root ? If the user has to be root, do we have to get into the business of telling people how to adjust their /etc/ssh/sshd to allow root login ? * What happens if I do, juju add-machine