-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 25/08/13 13:17, David Cheney wrote:
Thanks John. James -- I have uploaded the release tarball now,
sorry about the delay, I was in an airplane.
No problem; juju-core 1.13.2 also uploaded to Saucy.
Cheers
James
- --
James Page
Ubuntu and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm implementing juju get via the API. In doing so, I moved over one
of our tests which did (pseudocode)
set value=int64(0)
DeepEquals(result, value)
And it used to work when ServiceGet was connecting directly to State.
Now that it goes via the
James,
Thanks for uploading to Saucy.
Julian/David,
I see the fix is committed We'll need to cut another release this
week for any remaining Azure fixes in preparation for the announcement
next week. David, could you confirm with Julian on when is the
correct time to cut another devel release?
On 23/08/13 21:37, roger peppe wrote:
On 23 August 2013 04:11, Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.com wrote:
// TODO (thumper): 2013-08-23 bug 1654321
// Details about the change needed, or things to do.
This seems reasonable, but there's one down side - currently
for most TODOs, a grep will
Hi all,
If you haven't yet, please get a copy of Clean Code [1] as we will be
starting reviews of it soon.
I have found a reference in that book that pretty clearly describes my
dislike for single character variable names. I type that section here.
Avoid Mental Mapping [2]
Readers shouldn't
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.comwrote:
Perhaps we should have a sanity-check type callback into the provider
with the constraints at the time we want to add a machine. This would
give the null provider the early fail mechanism, and could also allow
other
I don't have time to properly respond, but I'm pretty sure no one on this
team is using single letter variables to save keystrokes.
Is is a good point that abbreviations may be more common in one area than
another. I find both ctx and txn to be completely self explanatory even
with zero context
On 27/08/13 11:50, Andrew Wilkins wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.com
mailto:tim.pen...@canonical.com wrote:
Perhaps we should have a sanity-check type callback into the provider
with the constraints at the time we want to add a machine. This
I think they should be ignored, but preserved.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.com wrote:
On 27/08/13 11:50, Andrew Wilkins wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.com
mailto:tim.pen...@canonical.com wrote:
Perhaps we
On 27/08/13 15:30, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.com wrote:
On 27/08/13 14:33, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.com
wrote:
Information hiding and abstracting implementation
10 matches
Mail list logo