I've personally found it quite edifying to see what William and Nate like,
and while I don't think we should enforce a One True Way, I have tweaked my
own preferences a bit from the discussion.
Somewhere between 3 an William's 3. I don't really prefer Nate's 3 because
the args aren't wrapped the
Sure, I like the discussion too and it has been interesting to see what
gofmt thankfully else accepts There have been some formats I never tried
before.
mue
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:53 AM, John Meinel j...@arbash-meinel.com wrote:
I've personally found it quite edifying to see what William
Hi all,
I took it upon myself to get Rog's errgo library used inside juju-core.
Dimiter recently did a hunk of work in the juju-core/errors package to
have functions to add context to some core error types while keeping
their type.
What I did was to move this errors package out of juju-core and
I'd like gccgo to pass reliably, but I think it falls under a CI test
rather than a pre-commit test. (Because otherwise it roughly doubles the
time it takes to know whether your patch will land.)
I don't have specific feedback on the behavior differences, but the changes
seem sane to me. An
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 8:12 AM, John Meinel j...@arbash-meinel.com wrote:
I'd like gccgo to pass reliably, but I think it falls under a CI test rather
than a pre-commit test. (Because otherwise it roughly doubles the time it
takes to know whether your patch will land.)
I agree. We can setup
I know juju run is out but I am wondering when we should expect Actions
that do not require ssh access to the machines?
Also, will actions allow arbitrary (defined at runtime) hook code or show
the code be part of the charm already?
Thanks,
Mike
--
Juju-dev mailing list
Just to get some clarification -- are we handling juju updates within
the archive through the normal SRU processes? It was mentioned that
there may be an exception for juju-core but wanted to make sure before
I go through with patching the existing package (1.18.1 at the time of
this writing).
We're working on Actions ... it's going in fits and starts. We've got a
lot to learn (and appreciate all the time and attention from all of you
experienced juju devs)
We were thinking maybe by the middle of June, but we've been
over-optimistic in the past. Hopefully soon!
irc: jcw4, bodie_,
