On 07/10/16 13:59, Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote:
> Tell the juju controller to use devel streams. Eg, to upgrade my own
> deployment, I I set the streams to devel, then upgrade the controller
> than the hosted model.
Guys, there should be no devel streams in 2.0.
One stream, with all releases,
On 07/10/16 11:49, Adam Israel wrote:
> One potential way to display the information, using existing
> whitespace so we're not changing the overall layout.
>
> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23290044/
Yeah, I like that, Though I would do it as:
Unit (*leader) Workload ...
If we're touching that
Thanks Curtis! following your steps and setting the agent-stream=devel, I
was able to upgrade the controller and default models to rc3
Matt
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> You, and several of us, are victims of '"upload-tools
Hi Matt,
You, and several of us, are victims of '"upload-tools strikes back"
cannot upgrade with streams'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1631529
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Matt Rae wrote:
> Hi, I'm testing an upgrade between juju 2.0 rc2 and rc3.
>
> Should
One potential way to display the information, using existing whitespace so
we're not changing the overall layout.
http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23290044/
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:52 AM Adam Israel
wrote:
> That's a great piece of information to relay to the user. Is
> A new development release of Juju, 2.0-rc3, is here!
...
> ## How do I get it?
You can now install the Juju 2.0-rc3 snap.
snap install juju --beta --devmode
^ This is the 2.0-rc3. Juju requires requires confinement: devmode,
which restricts our RCs and stables to the beta channel :(
--
Hi, I'm testing an upgrade between juju 2.0 rc2 and rc3.
Should 'juju upgrade-juju -m default' upgrade to rc3?
So far I'm seeing 'no upgrades available'
$ juju model-config agent-version
2.0-rc2
$ juju --version
2.0-rc3-xenial-amd64
$ juju upgrade-juju
no upgrades available
$ juju upgrade-juju
On 07/10/16 09:58, Adam Israel wrote:
> It looks like rc3 introduced a minor change in the status output. Each
> unit has an asterisk next to its name, i.e., mariadb/0* (full output
> in pastebin). What is the asterisk meant to represent?
>
> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23289710/
I believe thats
It indicates that that unit is the leader for the application. It's a bit
academic in the status you pasted, since each application only has one
unit, but I can see it being useful if you had scaled out a bit.
Cheers,
Christian
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:59 PM Adam Israel
It looks like rc3 introduced a minor change in the status output. Each unit
has an asterisk next to its name, i.e., mariadb/0* (full output in
pastebin). What is the asterisk meant to represent?
http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23289710/
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 5:28 PM Andrew Wilkins
10 matches
Mail list logo