Re: Dependencies added for new jsonschema support

Thanks, Katherine, I had intended to mention in the email that this was a request for review by the tech board :) On Tue, Nov 1, 2016, 5:14 PM Katherine Cox-Buday < katherine.cox-bu...@canonical.com> wrote: > Nate Finch writes: > > > In support of my PR that adds an interactive mode for add-clou

Re: Dependencies added for new jsonschema support

Nate Finch writes: > In support of my PR that adds an interactive mode for add-cloud, we needed to > add > jsonschema for the cloud configurations that can be inspected at runtime to > generate the > interactive queries. Thanks for the great write-up, Nate. I've added it to the tech board agen

Dependencies added for new jsonschema support

In support of my PR that adds an interactive mode for add-cloud, we needed to add jsonschema for the cloud configurations that can be inspected at runtime to generate the interactive queries. Unfortunately, the jsonschema package we're currently using (gojs

Re: Juju 2.0.1 is here!​

This has been filed under https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1638304. Please continue discussion there. Thanks for the feedback Malte! Nicholas On 11/01/2016 08:19 AM, Malte Menkhoff wrote: Dear Juju-dev list, I am currently testing the different between Juju 2.0.0 and Juju 2.0.1 examplen

Re: [ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Marco Ceppi wrote: > This is really one of the goals. python-jujuclient, amulet, and even to an > extent deployer all poorly implement an abstraction to Juju. These will all > eventually fall away in favor of a consolidated, focused, well built Object > Oriented Py

Re: [ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

This is really one of the goals. python-jujuclient, amulet, and even to an extent deployer all poorly implement an abstraction to Juju. These will all eventually fall away in favor of a consolidated, focused, well built Object Oriented Python library. Marco On Tue, Nov 1, 2016, 4:25 PM Ryan Beisn

Re: [ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

This is good stuff. I think keeping it focused on Juju 2.0 and later, completely free of legacy shims, is a good thing. I'd love to be using this natively instead of the collective stack of [Amulet + Juju-deployer + python-jujuclient], and plan to take it for a spin. Cheers, Ryan On Tue, Nov 1

[ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

Hi everyone, We've been working on a new python client for Juju. It's still in development, but we wanted to share the first bits to illicit feedback: https://github.com/juju/python-libjuju Features of this library include: * fully asynchronous - uses asyncio and async/await features of python

Re: Juju 2.0.1 is here!​

Dear Juju-dev list, I am currently testing the different between Juju 2.0.0 and Juju 2.0.1 examplen an OpenStack provider which is based on Huawei FusionSphere. Juju 2.0.0 was able to get to the status of “Waiting for address” because we are using nova API calls instead of neutron API calls - th