Re: Copyright information in headers

2014-09-04 Thread John Meinel
a) As long as we are consistent, Copyright lines don't conflict. The only chance they do is if you have one long lived branch, and a file was created in 2012, in one long lived branch it gets updated in 2013, and then in the other it is updated again in 2014 and then you merge that long lived branc

Re: Copyright information in headers

2014-09-03 Thread Dimiter Naydenov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As we're on copyright headers topic, is there a clear policy what headers to use for contributed code, like the one Joyent did or CloudSigma ? Should it be: // Copyright 2014 Canonical Ltd. // Copyright 2014 CONTRIBUTOR-XYZ.. // Licensed under the AG

Re: Copyright information in headers

2014-09-03 Thread Dimiter Naydenov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 4.09.2014 00:54, David Cheney wrote: > I think this is needless busy work, I vote that as long as there is > a copyright header with _a_ year, that is sufficient. > +100 Let's not do that please, it's pointless. > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:50 AM,

Re: Copyright information in headers

2014-09-03 Thread Andrew Wilkins
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Ian Booth wrote: > Hi folks > > The question recently came up in reviews as to whether we should be > updating the > date in the copyright statement in the file header when we make a change > to the > code in that file. I sought clarification from Robie Basak, who

Re: Copyright information in headers

2014-09-03 Thread Jesse Meek
I've been asking for updates in my reviews. I'm happy to stop if the consensus is we don't need to. Once we get an agreement on policy, let's put it in the style guide. On 04/09/14 09:55, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: I suggest not updating it. Updates on the same line will conflict, and cause comp

Re: Copyright information in headers

2014-09-03 Thread Gustavo Niemeyer
I suggest not updating it. Updates on the same line will conflict, and cause completely unnecessary headaches. These files are under revision control, so there are better proofs of when it was changed than just that header. Then, in a decade or two, if somebody cares, update them all at once. On W

Re: Copyright information in headers

2014-09-03 Thread David Cheney
I think this is needless busy work, I vote that as long as there is a copyright header with _a_ year, that is sufficient. On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Ian Booth wrote: > Hi folks > > The question recently came up in reviews as to whether we should be updating > the > date in the copyright sta

Copyright information in headers

2014-09-03 Thread Ian Booth
Hi folks The question recently came up in reviews as to whether we should be updating the date in the copyright statement in the file header when we make a change to the code in that file. I sought clarification from Robie Basak, who previously had provided input on licensing issues and compliance