Re: Fwd: series-agnostic charm URLs

2014-07-25 Thread roger peppe
[re-cc'ing to juju-dev] On 25 July 2014 00:59, Casey Marshall wrote: > charm.URL and charm.Reference helps clearly delineate whether a series > must be defined using the type system. This is stronger and more robust > than conditional checking on the series when servicing API requests. Expressin

Fwd: series-agnostic charm URLs

2014-07-23 Thread roger peppe
In the charm store and the bundle specification, we use both fully specified charm URLs (with series) and partially specified charm URLs (without series and/or version). Currently in the charm package, the charm.URL type represents the former, the charn.Reference type represents the former; but th