Re: Merge gating for more juju subprojects

2015-03-25 Thread Martin Packman
On 25/03/2015, Rick Harding wrote: > If you're using the github lander make sure the user has made it's org > membership public. Thanks Rick, that was is. Thought I'd marked the bot's membership of go-goose at public previously, but had not. Martin -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubunt

Re: Merge gating for more juju subprojects

2015-03-24 Thread Andrew Wilkins
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Rick Harding wrote: > If you're using the github lander make sure the user has made it's org > membership public. > kat-co's membership to go-goose is public. I think we used to have this same issue with juju, but not for a long time. > Rick > On Mar 24, 2015 8:

Re: Merge gating for more juju subprojects

2015-03-24 Thread Rick Harding
If you're using the github lander make sure the user has made it's org membership public. Rick On Mar 24, 2015 8:49 PM, "Martin Packman" wrote: > On 24/03/2015, Andrew Wilkins wrote: > > > > Katherine just tried to $$merge$$ a go-goose branch, and it looks like > the > > script is broken: https

Re: Merge gating for more juju subprojects

2015-03-24 Thread Martin Packman
On 24/03/2015, Andrew Wilkins wrote: > > Katherine just tried to $$merge$$ a go-goose branch, and it looks like the > script is broken: https://github.com/go-goose/goose/pull/3 > > Tests passed, but merge failed. Ian merged manually. Hmm, would have been nice to send it through again to see what

Re: Merge gating for more juju subprojects

2015-03-24 Thread Andrew Wilkins
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Martin Packman < martin.pack...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 13/03/2015, Martin Packman wrote: > > > > That said, if there are any packages you think we should *not* gate > > landings on their test suite passing yet, please say now. > > With the lack of objections,

Re: Merge gating for more juju subprojects

2015-03-24 Thread Martin Packman
On 13/03/2015, Martin Packman wrote: > > That said, if there are any packages you think we should *not* gate > landings on their test suite passing yet, please say now. With the lack of objections, I've gone ahead and made the more active projects in the juju namespace on github merge gated. >Fr

Re: Merge gating for more juju subprojects

2015-03-14 Thread Dimiter Naydenov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks for doing this Martin! I can't wait to try it out next week :) Cheers, Dimiter On 14.03.2015 00:01, Martin Packman wrote: > I've put up a gating job for goose on our jenkins slave for juju: > >

Merge gating for more juju subprojects

2015-03-13 Thread Martin Packman
I've put up a gating job for goose on our jenkins slave for juju: It will likely need some more work, but I fake-landed Katherine's proposed branch and it passed. The switch over steps are disabling direct landing for most/all contributers and ge