Proposal: move package replicaset to its own GitHub repo

2015-03-25 Thread Andrew Wilkins
I'd like to move the replicaset package to github.com/juju/replicaset. For rationale and preparatory changes, see: http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/1260/ Please debate here. Silence == tacit approval. Thanks, Andrew -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Re: Proposal: move package replicaset to its own GitHub repo

2015-03-25 Thread roger peppe
This seems like a grand plan to me. On 25 March 2015 at 08:12, Andrew Wilkins wrote: > I'd like to move the replicaset package to github.com/juju/replicaset. For > rationale and preparatory changes, see: http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/1260/ > > Please debate here. Silence == tacit approval. > > Thank

Re: Proposal: move package replicaset to its own GitHub repo

2015-03-25 Thread Nate Finch
+100, thanks for doing this, Andrew! On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:16 AM, roger peppe wrote: > This seems like a grand plan to me. > > On 25 March 2015 at 08:12, Andrew Wilkins > wrote: > > I'd like to move the replicaset package to github.com/juju/replicaset. > For > > rationale and preparatory ch

Re: Proposal: move package replicaset to its own GitHub repo

2015-03-25 Thread David Cheney
Do it! On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Nate Finch wrote: > +100, thanks for doing this, Andrew! > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:16 AM, roger peppe > wrote: >> >> This seems like a grand plan to me. >> >> On 25 March 2015 at 08:12, Andrew Wilkins >> wrote: >> > I'd like to move the replicaset pac

Re: Proposal: move package replicaset to its own GitHub repo

2015-03-25 Thread John Meinel
Wasn't the original premise that we would experiment with replica set work, and then the code would end up in upstream mgo? John =:-> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Andrew Wilkins < andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote: > I'd like to move the replicaset package to github.com/juju/replicaset. >

Re: Proposal: move package replicaset to its own GitHub repo

2015-03-25 Thread Tim Penhey
Agreed. Makes a lot of sense to me. On 26/03/15 00:33, David Cheney wrote: > Do it! > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Nate Finch wrote: >> +100, thanks for doing this, Andrew! >> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:16 AM, roger peppe >> wrote: >>> >>> This seems like a grand plan to me. >>> >>> On

Re: Proposal: move package replicaset to its own GitHub repo

2015-03-25 Thread Andrew Wilkins
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:40 PM, John Meinel wrote: > Wasn't the original premise that we would experiment with replica set > work, and then the code would end up in upstream mgo? > I vaguely recall hearing that. Sounds sensible, and something that can still be done later. > John > =:-> > > On