Re: RFC: remove juju publish?

2016-07-17 Thread Rick Harding
/me takes Tim's candy and yells "bad Tim! that was Aaron's candy!" On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 4:53 PM Tim Penhey wrote: > Was actually Aaron, I was just confirming with the list :-) > > Tim > > On 16/07/16 00:08, Rick Harding wrote: > > +1, good catch thanks Tim. > > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:1

Re: RFC: remove juju publish?

2016-07-17 Thread Tim Penhey
Was actually Aaron, I was just confirming with the list :-) Tim On 16/07/16 00:08, Rick Harding wrote: +1, good catch thanks Tim. On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:15 AM roger peppe mailto:rogpe...@gmail.com>> wrote: Yes, it should be removed. It's superceded by charm push. On 15 July 2016 a

Re: RFC: remove juju publish?

2016-07-15 Thread Rick Harding
+1, good catch thanks Tim. On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:15 AM roger peppe wrote: > Yes, it should be removed. It's superceded by charm push. > > On 15 July 2016 at 04:32, Tim Penhey wrote: > > Does 'juju publish' still serve a purpose in Juju 2.0? > > > > Should we just remove it? > > > > Tim > >

Re: RFC: remove juju publish?

2016-07-15 Thread roger peppe
Yes, it should be removed. It's superceded by charm push. On 15 July 2016 at 04:32, Tim Penhey wrote: > Does 'juju publish' still serve a purpose in Juju 2.0? > > Should we just remove it? > > Tim > > -- > Juju-dev mailing list > Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > ht

RFC: remove juju publish?

2016-07-14 Thread Tim Penhey
Does 'juju publish' still serve a purpose in Juju 2.0? Should we just remove it? Tim -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev