Ladies and Gentlemen, We build with Go 1.6 everywhere.
Take a moment to consider the implications, because that means we do
not use Go 1.2, 1.3, or 1.5. Juju 1.x and 2.x for Windows, OS X, and
Linux (precise, trusty, wily, xenial, and centos7) are built with Go 1.6.
There was concern about how to
Thank you for all your work on this, Curtis!
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical <
cur...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Ladies and Gentlemen, We build with Go 1.6 everywhere.
>
> Take a moment to consider the implications, because that means we do
> not use Go 1.2, 1.3, or 1.5. Juj
Glorious. Thanks so much for all the work, Michael and Curtis and team!
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016, 1:16 PM Cheryl Jennings
wrote:
> Thank you for all your work on this, Curtis!
>
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical <
> cur...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>> Ladies and Gentlemen, We
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 12:55 AM Curtis Hovey-Canonical <
cur...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Ladies and Gentlemen, We build with Go 1.6 everywhere.
>
> Take a moment to consider the implications, because that means we do
> not use Go 1.2, 1.3, or 1.5. Juju 1.x and 2.x for Windows, OS X, and
> Linux (p
On 11 April 2016 at 04:55, Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote:
> Ladies and Gentlemen, We build with Go 1.6 everywhere.
>
> Take a moment to consider the implications, because that means we do
> not use Go 1.2, 1.3, or 1.5. Juju 1.x and 2.x for Windows, OS X, and
> Linux (precise, trusty, wily, xenial,
This is awesome!
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical <
cur...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Ladies and Gentlemen, We build with Go 1.6 everywhere.
>
> ...
>
> 2. Centos and Windows unit test are still Go 1.2 because many lxd
> related tests fail when run with Go 1.6.
>
I can thin
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:14 AM, John Meinel wrote:
> This is awesome!
>
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical
> wrote:
>>
>> Ladies and Gentlemen, We build with Go 1.6 everywhere.
>>
>> ...
>
>
>>
>> 2. Centos and Windows unit test are still Go 1.2 because many lxd
>> related