Re: Unit test failure in juju/errors

2015-02-09 Thread Tim Penhey
Actually it is testing the DeferredAnnotatef method, so yes it does need to use the defer. Strange that the line number is changing though. Tim On 07/02/15 07:58, roger peppe wrote: Interesting. It seems that the line reported for a defer has changed in 1.4. That said, I'm not really sure

Re: Unit test failure in juju/errors

2015-02-06 Thread roger peppe
On 6 February 2015 at 09:14, Matthew Williams matthew.willi...@canonical.com wrote: Hi Folks, It appears that juju/errors has a failing unit test: http://paste.ubuntu.com/10085832/ It also appears that it only fails in go1.4 Interesting. It seems that the line reported for a defer has

Re: Unit test failure in juju/errors

2015-02-06 Thread roger peppe
Interesting. It seems that the line reported for a defer has changed in 1.4. That said, I'm not really sure why that test needs to use defer. The functionality being tested doesn't rely on defer at all. On 6 February 2015 at 09:14, Matthew Williams matthew.willi...@canonical.com wrote: Hi

Unit test failure in juju/errors

2015-02-06 Thread Matthew Williams
Hi Folks, It appears that juju/errors has a failing unit test: http://paste.ubuntu.com/10085832/ It also appears that it only fails in go1.4 Matty -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev