On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Andrew Wilkins
wrote:
> Main thing that concerns me is that it's all opt-in.
Same here.
> I guess it doesn't
> matter
> too much, as long as CI continues to run all the tests. There's nothing
> stopping
> people from skipping running the tests and proposing junk
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Eric Snow wrote:
> We've had discussions here a couple of times (since I joined the team)
> about classifying tests in our suite so they could be run more
> flexibly. We've also already added explicit handling for a specific
> kind of test along those same lines:
We've had discussions here a couple of times (since I joined the team)
about classifying tests in our suite so they could be run more
flexibly. We've also already added explicit handling for a specific
kind of test along those same lines: featuretests. Additionally you
can think of the CI tests a
