On 31 October 2014 03:29, David P. Sanders dpsand...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the following count as a fragile hack? (Probably yes!)
macro run(file, args...)
args = [file, args...]
return esc(:(ARGS = map(string, $args)[2:end];
include(string($args[1]
end
IMO, yes.
julia
Sorry, I haven't updated the METADATA yet (if you look at the last tag you
can see that there are no iterators there
https://github.com/pwl/DASSL.jl/tree/v0.0.3). I will update METADATA later
this week, but for now you can try removing DASSL and reinstalling it with
Hello: I live in Pasadena and I would be very happy to meet any julia users
near LA or SB.
Cheers,
Amuthan
On Thursday, October 30, 2014 6:57:40 PM UTC-7, Stefan Karpinski wrote:
Split the difference? Oxnard Julia Users Group?
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Kevin Squire
Can I throw SD (San Diego) in the mix?
Regards,
Rob J. Goedman
goed...@icloud.com
On Oct 31, 2014, at 5:58 AM, Amuthan A. Ramabathiran apar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello: I live in Pasadena and I would be very happy to meet any julia users
near LA or SB.
Cheers,
Amuthan
On
FYI. We're about to incorporate libgit2 into the build system, so we can
begin the rewrite of Pkg to use it instead of shelling out to command-line
git. libgit2 can only be built via cmake. So, if you're building master
from source, you'll need cmake to be installed once pull request 8820 is
On Thursday, October 30, 2014 11:42:38 PM UTC-7, Daniel Carrera wrote:
The point is that Julia will parse the entire line and form a parse tree
before it begins to interpret the instruction. Therefore, the @run line has
to parse correctly as valid Julia syntax.
If you want to type fewer
Hi
This is my first experiment with Julia and I wanted to share some results.
I have ported the STREAM benchmark (http://www.cs.virginia.edu/stream/) to
Julia. The code is available on github
(https://github.com/kapiliitr/JuliaBenchmarks/blob/master/streamp.jl).
I am getting the following
Paweł and Alex ...
thanks for the pointers and context for the various README files ...
i will give the Pkg.clone approach a whirl later today; that looks to
be a good approach for ensuring the very latest code is used when
desired.
fine work on this module, though ... you have my admiration.
I'm at USC, and this would be very cool.
On Thursday, October 30, 2014 11:23:17 AM UTC-7, Jim Garrison wrote:
Hi there,
I am quite excited about Julia and am considering organizing a Julia
Meetup group (or otherwise) in Southern California. I live in Santa
Barbara, but I'm betting it
I have a very simple function
immutable TypeConst{T} end
function innerloop!{T, M}(dest::Vector{T}, dest_ofs, src::Vector{T}, src_ofs
, ::TypeConst{M})
@simd for i=1:M
@inbounds dest[i + dest_ofs] $= src[i + src_ofs]
end
end
On 31 October 2014 18:46, Jason Merrill jwmerr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, October 30, 2014 11:42:38 PM UTC-7, Daniel Carrera wrote:
The point is that Julia will parse the entire line and form a parse tree
before it begins to interpret the instruction. Therefore, the @run line has
to
Looks nice. I am no expert on Unit testing, but I like it. How does it
compare to Julia's native testing framework?
On Friday, 31 October 2014 01:36:36 UTC+1, Sal Mangano wrote:
https://github.com/smangano/JLTest https://github.com/smangano/JLTest
On Thursday, October 30, 2014 8:08:23 PM
Paweł and Alex ...
have either of you had any time logged with the Sims package:
https://github.com/tshort/Sims.jl
best,
cdm
Unfortunately, no. I just know that it uses Sundials.jl ...
What are you trying to achieve? If it is Sims.jl specific it might be
better to start a new thread so that Tom can comment (or open an issue at
github).
Best,
Alex.
On Saturday, 1 November 2014 00:41:32 UTC+1, cdm wrote:
Paweł
I find Base.Test to be too minimalistic but these thing are a question of
different tastes, of course. I wanted the ability to group tests into named
testcases and named tests with test statistics being collected as the test
runs. I maybe could have built on top of Base.Test but I also wanted
15 matches
Mail list logo
