On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 04:56, Amuthan A. Ramabathiran apar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I ran into this problem recently:
julia a = Array{Int,1}[]
0-element Array{Array{Int64,1},1}
julia b = zeros(Int,2)
2-element Array{Int64,1}:
0
0
julia b[1] = 1
1
julia push!(a,b)
1-element
Ah right. Thanks!
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Mauro mauro...@runbox.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 04:56, Amuthan A. Ramabathiran apar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I ran into this problem recently:
julia a = Array{Int,1}[]
0-element Array{Array{Int64,1},1}
julia b =
Using GitHub for auth actually makes a lot of sense and would allow us to use
GitHub for persistence unconditionally instead of as an option, which might be
simpler. Of course then there will always be someone who objects to having a
GitHub account ;-)
On Nov 14, 2014, at 6:24 AM, SVAKSHA
Hi Tamas,
Thanks for your input! Indeed it appears that shape preserving
interpolation in higher dimensions is a somewhat tricky problem. Most of
the literature I've found is in applied maths journals and not a lot seems
to have been transferred to economics, although there's a paper by Cai
I'm not sure but it's quite possible that this was fixed independently of
this email. Jeff has been doing most of the work on call overloading and he
doesn't (afaik) read julia-users very often. Sorry that you wasted time on
that and thanks for looking into this.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:57 AM,
Hello all,
I actually fixed the problem by adding type specifications to all function
calls and immutable types involved. Maybe this was also fixed in Julia 0.4 in
the time being, but I was not able to follow as I follow the recommendation of
developing all my package code in 0.3 and just
On Friday, 14 November 2014 12:45:54 UTC+1, Stefan Karpinski wrote:
Using GitHub for auth actually makes a lot of sense and would allow us to
use GitHub for persistence unconditionally instead of as an option, which
might be simpler. Of course then there will always be someone who objects
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Viral Shah vi...@mayin.org wrote:
Basically, JuliaBox gives you hosted IJulia and a persistent filesystem. So,
you are not restricted to your local device. There is also a shell and
ability to sync Google Drive and Github repos, or simply upload your files,
No you won't have sudo access since that may lead to a broken container.
You can however compile programs in your home directory which will persist
across sessions. If you require some package that might be generally useful
to others as well do open an issue at github.com/JuliaLang/JuliaBox
On Thursday, November 13, 2014 9:34:49 PM UTC-5, Chris Binz wrote:
Is there a way of getting an individual color value via an index of a
ColorMap object in PyPlot? This (Python) code snippet (from here
http://stackoverflow.com/a/12858391/2175008) hopefully explains what
I'm after:
Thank you. I literally just figured out this workaround about 5 minutes
ago, and was about to reply with it when I saw your message.
On Friday, November 14, 2014 12:41:35 PM UTC-5, Steven G. Johnson wrote:
On Thursday, November 13, 2014 9:34:49 PM UTC-5, Chris Binz wrote:
Is there a way of
I tried
@inbounds out[(i-1)*f.interp+1:i*f.interp] = shift_compute1 (f, u, i, i)
and got
ERROR: wrong number of arguments
So can @inbounds only apply on RHS?
--
-- Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it
Looks like that should work. Have you tried removing the space in
shift_compute1
(f, u, i, i) between the method name and argument list? I get the same
error with a space there.
— Mike
Relative to the construction of a Symmetric matrix (which is almost a noop)
it is expensive to symmetrize it, but maybe it is negligible compared to
the operations you'll run on the matrix afterwards.
2014-11-13 11:25 GMT-05:00 Steven G. Johnson stevenj@gmail.com:
On Thursday, November
To follow up on that here's the output from quoting that problematic line:
```
julia :(@inbounds out[(i-1)*f.interp+1:i*f.interp] = shift_compute1 (f, u,
i, i)).args
3-element Array{Any,1}:
symbol(@inbounds)
:(out[(i - 1) * f.interp + 1:i * f.interp] =
And here's the issue I was referring to
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/7232.
realm and imagem might be the wrong name
as realm should be a matrix with the same eigenvectors
of A but the real part of the eigenvalues etc
On Friday, November 14, 2014 2:10:43 PM UTC-5, Andreas Noack wrote:
Relative to the construction of a Symmetric matrix (which is almost a
noop) it
Hi,
I hardly have any experience with hashing, so I thought I better ask here,
before I do something silly.
First, how do you make sets use a custom hashing functions for your own
types?
This doesn't seem to work:
*immutable Test*
*x::ASCIIString*
*end*
*Base.hash(h::Test) = hash(h.x)*
I'd suggest you start with the documentation for hash
http://docs.julialang.org/en/latest/stdlib/base/#Base.hash and isequal
http://docs.julialang.org/en/latest/stdlib/base/#Base.isequal, and look
at some implementation of hash to understand the two argument version.
As far as I understand,
Is there a way to create by concatenation or otherwise a list of
sequentially numbered variables e.g.:
text1 = @Entry(editable = false)
text2 = @Entry(editable = false)
text3 = @Entry(editable = false)
text4 = @Entry(editable = false)
i.e. want to append a number to the end of a variable
tried calling a simple fortran function from julia but did not succeed:
this is the fortran code:
!fileName = simplemodule.f95
module simpleModule
contains
function foo(x)
integer :: foo, x
foo = x * 2
end function foo
end module simplemodule
which is then compiled with:
*gfortran
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Andre Bieler andre.biele...@gmail.com wrote:
tried calling a simple fortran function from julia but did not succeed:
this is the fortran code:
!fileName = simplemodule.f95
module simpleModule
contains
function foo(x)
integer :: foo, x
foo = x * 2
end
I don't think the answer to your question is the best solution to your
problem, I'll first ask why you don't append the entries to an array
instead?
The answer to this question depends on whether you want to create function
scope variables or global scope variables. You have to use some sort
The first way to compile is the good one, but gfortran is slightly
changing the names of the function. You can see it by running the `nm`
command :
```
$ nm simplemodule.so
0f98 T ___simplemodule_MOD_foo
```
So you have to call `__simplemodule_MOD_foo` from Julia side (yes, with
Maybe this can help too:
http://maurow.bitbucket.org/notes/calling_fortran_from_misc.html
By using bind(c) or iso_c_binding name mangling is turned off.
On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 22:15, Luthaf lut...@luthaf.fr wrote:
The first way to compile is the good one, but gfortran is slightly
changing the
Thanks guys that worked!!
On Friday, November 14, 2014 4:22:44 PM UTC-5, Luthaf wrote:
The first way to compile is the good one, but gfortran is slightly
changing the names of the function. You can see it by running the `nm`
command :
```
$ nm simplemodule.so
0f98 T
Hi,
Anyone know of how you can easily look at package code while in Julia? It
would be great if there were a way to do that... I ended up going into the
.julia directory and somehow screwed up Git so I couldn't Pkg.update()
anymore...
Frank
You could look at the code on Github?
It sounds like you edited the file, so Pkg.update() can't update the code
as it doesn't want to overwrite any changes you have made. The most simple
way to fix this would be to remove the folders for any packages you've
dirtied and then run Pkg.update() to
El viernes, 14 de noviembre de 2014 15:59:17 UTC-6, Frank Davidson escribió:
Hi,
Anyone know of how you can easily look at package code while in Julia? It
would be great if there were a way to do that... I ended up going into the
.julia directory and somehow screwed up Git so I couldn't
Yes, I did that, but I was thinking that it might be nice to just be able
to pull up the code for a type or function to see the exact implementation
directly in Julia...
So you haven't heard of anything like that, I guess?
Thanks for the help!
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:30 PM Iain Dunning
El viernes, 14 de noviembre de 2014 15:59:17 UTC-6, Frank Davidson escribió:
Hi,
Anyone know of how you can easily look at package code while in Julia? It
would be great if there were a way to do that... I ended up going into the
.julia directory and somehow screwed up Git so I couldn't
We have macros @less and @edit that might do what you want
Arrayfire has a large library for GPU computing. They have decided to make
their codes open source. I am hoping that someone much more able than me
will write some sort of wrapper to use the Arrayfire library in Julia.
Here is the github link: https://github.com/arrayfire/arrayfire
somehow screwed up Git so I couldn't Pkg.update() anymore...
Use `Pkg.status()` to figure out which are dirty. Then you can do:
julia Pkg.cd(PkgName)
shell git stash # safer, will save changes to a hash outside the main
history.
or
shell git reset HEAD --hard # unsafe - will destroy any
Thanks Ivar:
I have got it working using an array as you suggested (not sure why I
hadn't thought of this already) using following code:
using Gtk.ShortNames
G11=@Grid()
array1=Array(Any,i)
array2=[1:1:10]
for i in 1:10
array1[i]= @Entry()
a=array1[i]
b=array2[i]
G11[1,i]=a
Thanks Simon
I tried this Dict way but ended up with no method exceptions when trying to
setproperty! which was the next step..
I will have an explore of how to do this in Dictionarys and if successful
will report back.
Cheers Will
On Friday, November 14, 2014 9:27:47 PM UTC, Simon Danisch
I had the same response, great that they open-sourced the library, and
wrapping it in a Julia package would be interesting and not that hard to
do. It just needs someone to put a little bit of time into it. How long
have you been using Julia? Try compiling the arrayfire library and writing
a
thanks. I have been using Julia for five months or so. I have not used the
ccall function ever. I will try it out as soon as I am done my current
project.
On Friday, 14 November 2014 18:29:09 UTC-5, Tony Kelman wrote:
I had the same response, great that they open-sourced the library, and
Thank you for the response Tim.
sizeof(Person) is 48. Now, I know you said that it is not as
straightforward as looking just sizeof(Person). But when sizeof(Person) is
48 and I have
1728000 bytes allocated to Line 56, then is this more or less a certain
sign that something is wrong. Or, is
It accumulates across your entire session. You can reset with
`clear_malloc_data`.
The 48 bytes only include a _pointer_ to the Dict. You'd need to also include
the space used by the Dict itself. One easy way to get an approximate number
is
@allocated [H = xHutil, L = 100 - xHutil]
(It's
40 matches
Mail list logo
