Ok that makes sense. Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: "ele...@gmail.com"
Sent: 4/3/2015 3:35 AM
To: "julia-users@googlegroups.com"
Subject: [julia-users] Re: Garbage collection when calling a function
On Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 10:51:52 PM UTC+11, Ali Rezaee wrote:
Dear all,
I don't know much about PyCall / PyPlot, so I can't answer that, sorry :-(
Am 02.04.2015 um 19:35 schrieb Diego Tapias :
> Ok, thank you!
> Sorry for my grammar, I often type very fast and don't check it.
> I see your point but it's confusing for me that the same syntax worked a few
> days ag
Thanks. Scaleway seems like they will give the machines instantaneously and at
11 Euros/month, is cheap enough. I’ll go with that for now.
Also, I do believe that travis has cross-compilation support for ARM, and can
run stuff through qemu. Maybe we can build julia and run one simple test or
so
Hello colleagues,
why do i get different status?
julia> Pkg.status()
12 required packages:
- Autoreload0.2.0
- Cairo 0.2.26
- Clang 0.0.5
- Debug 0.1.2
- Docile0.4.8
- Gadfly
Well, this is the first time it's happened this way around :)
The first thing I would do is open the copy of Julia that Juno is running
using the "open a terminal" command, and see whether that gives the right
results. If the version is different, a bug may have been introduced by a
backport or so
Does Pkg.dir() return the same directory as the one you tried from the shell?
--Tim
On Friday, April 03, 2015 03:06:15 AM Andreas Lobinger wrote:
> Hello colleagues,
>
> why do i get different status?
>
> julia> Pkg.status()
> 12 required packages:
> - Autoreload0.2.0
> -
No ... (note to myself: mark backups with non-ambiguous names)
Thank you. (i wasn't aware of Pkg.dir()).
Thanks
On Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 10:48:53 AM UTC+1, pip7...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hi
> How can I save the following example plot(g) to .gif / .png or .jpg file
>
> julia> using Graphs
>
> julia> g = simple_graph(3)
> Directed Graph (3 vertices, 0 edges)
>
> julia> add_edge!(g, 1, 2)
> edge [1
On Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 1:35:34 PM UTC-4, Diego Tapias wrote:
>
> Ok, thank you!
> Sorry for my grammar, I often type very fast and don't check it.
> I see your point but it's confusing for me that the same syntax worked a
> few days ago. Do you know if this is a new feature of matplotlib
Hi Mike:
I followed your suggestion , the Julia version used by Juno was 0.3.4 and
the standalone REPL was 0.3.7 (all x86_64-w64-mingw32), so indeed it seems
that new version introduced a bug of some kind.
On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 3:12:47 AM UTC-7, Mike Innes wrote:
>
> Well, this is the
Would you be able to produce a minimal test case that works in the 0.3.4
REPL but not in 0.3.7, then file that as an issue on the Julia repo?
On 3 April 2015 at 15:09, Siyi Deng wrote:
> Hi Mike:
> I followed your suggestion , the Julia version used by Juno was 0.3.4 and
> the standalone REPL wa
Hi Kevin:
The actual code unfortunately I am not within the power to fully disclose,
but let me describe what basically it was trying to do here:
the code is doing so simple statistics (lets assume a max-filter here) on a
real-time integer stream. Therefor it uses a c struct to hold the
state-
I am using IJulia.
I want to construct my own colormaps..
when I load PyPlot (with: using PyPlot) the funcstion ListedColormap is not
available
when I try to load matplotllib.colors which owns the function, with import
matplotlib.colors I get the message that import is a syntax error.
How to d
Hi, following your suggestion, I opened a new issue on Julia repo:
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/10734
On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 7:15:19 AM UTC-7, Mike Innes wrote:
>
> Would you be able to produce a minimal test case that works in the 0.3.4
> REPL but not in 0.3.7, then file that
I have the following (for me) unexpected behavior for an if statement in
the code below:
It is not the same If I comment out the line
data = readdlm("somefile.dat")
or not. even if the "if-statement" is evaluated as false.
The function takes much longer to execute when the line is not commented
Are you timing the first execution of the function? Because if so it's
probably reading in and compiling the DataFrames piece. What happens when
you run it for a second time?
On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 8:43:12 AM UTC-7, Andre Bieler wrote:
>
> I have the following (for me) unexpected behavior f
Looks like a really helpful report – thanks!
On 3 April 2015 at 16:38, Siyi Deng wrote:
> Hi, following your suggestion, I opened a new issue on Julia repo:
> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/10734
>
>
> On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 7:15:19 AM UTC-7, Mike Innes wrote:
>>
>> Would you be
It turns out that julia 0.3.4 didn't enforce immutable in ccalls, and I
should be using mutable types to store states. Thanks for the help
everybody!
On Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 7:28:16 PM UTC-7, Siyi Deng wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have created a c shared library using visual-studio; then I called t
Hi Kevin
I have come to rely heavily on Match.jl. When I recently upgraded to v0.1.2
I got the error:
ERROR: fieldnames not defined
When reverting back to v0.0.6 everything runs fine. I'm certainly no
Package wizard, but is there something I might be doing wrong?
thanks!
Bill
On Monday, Marc
Hi William,
Thanks for the email. I should be able up fix this later today, but could
you open an issue at the Match.jl repo?
Thanks,
Kevin
On Friday, April 3, 2015, William Macready
wrote:
> Hi Kevin
>
> I have come to rely heavily on Match.jl. When I recently upgraded to
> v0.1.2 I got the
Are you guys familiar with http://ioam.github.io/holoviews ?
Is anyone working on a Julia interface or port?
//A
I just found this as a starting point
http://philippjfr.com/blog/interfacing-holoviews-with-julia/
On Saturday, April 4, 2015 at 1:21:00 AM UTC+2, Andrei Berceanu wrote:
>
> Are you guys familiar with http://ioam.github.io/holoviews ?
> Is anyone working on a Julia interface or port?
>
> //A
>
I'm trying to figure out why the following algorithm is so slow in Julia.
$ julia pprpush_perf4.jl
elapsed time: 0.754419672 seconds # first run, no compiled
elapsed time: 0.627998826 seconds # second run, compiled
elapsed time: 0.616043857 seconds (292 MB allocated, 1.52% gc time in 14
pauses w
Hi,
I am struggling with an issue related to garbage collection taking up the
vast majority (>99%) of compute time on a simple nested for loop. Code
excerpt below:
# julia version 0.3.7
# counts is an MxN matrix of Float64
# N=15000
# M=108
# h_cols and c_cols are indices \in {1:M}
using Hypoth
Actually, you might just need to run a Pkg.update(). Compat.jl is probably
out if date. You'll need to run Pkg.free("Match") of course.
On Friday, April 3, 2015, Kevin Squire > wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> Thanks for the email. I should be able up fix this later today, but could
> you open an issue a
On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 11:05:16 AM UTC-4, Anders Madsen wrote:
>
> I am using IJulia.
> I want to construct my own colormaps..
>
> when I load PyPlot (with: using PyPlot) the funcstion ListedColormap is
> not available
>
> when I try to load matplotllib.colors which owns the function, with
This might be an algorithm that benefits from the GC improvements in
0.4--with the caveat that 0.4 is still a work in progress and has a variety
of syntax changes (and possibly more to come) you might want to give that a
try.
On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 8:22:49 PM UTC-5, Adam Labadorf wrote:
>
Okay, it was a little more subtle than that: if your code was already using
Compat.jl, then everything would have worked. If not, then fieldnames
isn't defined at all (as you found out).
I believe I've fixed this issue, and I've tagged a new version of
Match.jl. Please try it and let me know if
I am changing the subject of this thread from GSOC to Spark. I was just
looking around and found this:
https://github.com/d9w/Spark.jl
The real question is with all the various systems out there, what is the
level of abstraction that julia should work with. Julia's DataFrames is one
level of a
Do you mean writing ODE solvers in Julia that run on GPUs? If so, the
answer is no. You can easily ccall CUDA/opencl solvers though.
-viral
On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 11:18:35 AM UTC+5:30, pauld11718 wrote:
>
> Is it possible in Julia - GPU based ODE solvers?
> There are ~250 Independent system
30 matches
Mail list logo
