Re: [julia-users] Re: Best compile and benchmark for haswell and broadwell architectures?

On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 8:51 PM, David Gleich wrote: > Thanks for that pointer. I'll take a look! I have a collection of really simple ones here[1]. It's not systematic or comprehensive in any sense but does check a few operations that I care about (simd and math functions)

[julia-users] Re: Best compile and benchmark for haswell and broadwell architectures?

Thanks for that pointer. I'll take a look! On Saturday, October 1, 2016 at 3:59:18 PM UTC-4, cormu...@mac.com wrote: > > I asked a similar question last week. The standard recommendation is > https://github.com/JuliaCI/BaseBenchmarks.jl. It didn't really meet what > I was looking for -- a

[julia-users] [ANN] TypedDelegation.jl

When you want to use the fields of a type as arguments to a function or where you want to apply a type-wrapped version an imported operator, TypedDelegation is available. Eight macros are exported. Four are for use where one field within a type is needed, and four where two fields within a

Re: [julia-users] Re: Definition of true for validity

Thanks a lot, Steve. > On Oct 1, 2016, at 17:13, Steven G. Johnson wrote: > > https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/c4ebf7c8bbdfaba034a08fa795b93a5732514c64/src/jltypes.c#L3724

Re: [julia-users] ANN: RawArray.jl

https://github.com/JuliaIO/NRRD.jl thats pure Julia Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2016 20:48:37 UTC+2 schrieb Steven G. Johnson: > > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 9:59:15 AM UTC-4, David Smith wrote: >> >> I also don't need it to read image formats. Part of the reason behind >> RawArray is to

[julia-users] Re: Definition of true for validity

https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/c4ebf7c8bbdfaba034a08fa795b93a5732514c64/src/jltypes.c#L3724

[julia-users] Best compile and benchmark for haswell and broadwell architectures?

I asked a similar question last week. The standard recommendation is https://github.com/JuliaCI/BaseBenchmarks.jl. It didn't really meet what I was looking for -- a quick, easy to run benchmark to compare machines -- but you may find it useful for your purposes.

Re: [julia-users] MPI.jl and composite types

There's `Gather` (low-level, adapted straight from the MPI standard) and `gather` (high-level, convenient for Julia, but apparently not yet implemented). -erik On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Joaquim Dias Garcia < joaquimdgar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks! Thats nice, I was misled by the gather

Re: [julia-users] MPI.jl and composite types

Thanks! Thats nice, I was misled by the gather function, i think I was looking too low level. Joaquim > On 1 Oct 2016, at 16:37, Erik Schnetter wrote: > > In Julia, `MPI` can send objects of any type. These objects will > automatically be serialized and deserialized. The

Re: [julia-users] MPI.jl and composite types

In Julia, `MPI` can send objects of any type. These objects will automatically be serialized and deserialized. The respective functions are ```Julia function send(obj, dest::Integer, tag::Integer, comm::Comm) function recv(src::Integer, tag::Integer, comm::Comm) ``` Note the lower-case function

[julia-users] MPI.jl and composite types

Hi all, I have the following type: type bar a::Int b::Vector{Matrix{Float64}} c::Vector{Float64} end I would like to send instances of that type via MPI. Can I do it? Is there any serialization/deserialization procedure i could use for that? thanks!

[julia-users] Re: Definition of true for validity

* Would anyone know in which file of https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia is the definition of {true} defined? Thanks On Saturday, October 1, 2016 at 3:35:10 PM UTC-3, Kevin Liu wrote: > > Hello. Would anyone know in which file of > https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia would the definition of

Re: [julia-users] ANN: RawArray.jl

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 9:59:15 AM UTC-4, David Smith wrote: > > I also don't need it to read image formats. Part of the reason behind > RawArray is to avoid standard image formats because they are not optimized > for large complex-float arrays. I just want to save multi-GB data

[julia-users] Definition of true for validity

Hello. Would anyone know in which file of https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia would the definition of {true} be defined? Thanks

[julia-users] Best compile and benchmark for haswell and broadwell architectures?

We just got a few new large memory machines with Haswell and Broadwell architectures. I'm wondering what is the current recommendation for getting Julia to run as fast as possible on these machines. We have a license for the Intel Compilers and MKL. So the question is: What's the best way to

[julia-users] membership checking in heap

I am trying to find a way to check the membership of a user defined type object in a heap. This is the code I have written: type HeapEntry k::Int dist::Float64 end isless(e1::HeapEntry, e2::HeapEntry) = e1.dist < e2.dist heap1 = [] Collection.heappush!(heap1, HeapEntry(1, 10.0)) But

Re: [julia-users] Generic Linux binaries for julia-0.4.6

We can add a note to the downloads page saying that past versions are still available by just modifying the version number in the url, if that would help. On Saturday, October 1, 2016 at 2:17:09 AM UTC-7, Mauro wrote: > > On Sat, 2016-10-01 at 10:38, ami...@gmail.com wrote: > > Great, a bit

[julia-users] Re: What is the deal with macros that do not return expressions?

In your two examples, note the difference *when* the macro argument is multiplied by 2. @ex_timestwo happens at runtime @n_timestwo happens at macro expansion time a = 6 @ex_timestwo(a) will return 12 as expected, whereas: a = 6 @n_timestwo(a) will still result in error because at macro

Re: [julia-users] What is the deal with macros that do not return expressions?

On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Lyndon White wrote: > I was generally under the impression that a macro always had the return a > `Expr` > and that doing otherwise would make the compiler yell at me. > > Apparently I was wrong, at least about the second part: >

[julia-users] What is the deal with macros that do not return expressions?

I was generally under the impression that a macro always had the return a `Expr` and that doing otherwise would make the compiler yell at me. Apparently I was wrong, at least about the second part: https://github.com/ChrisRackauckas/ParallelDataTransfer.jl/issues/3 macro ex_timestwo(x)

Re: [julia-users] Generic Linux binaries for julia-0.4.6

On Sat, 2016-10-01 at 10:38, amik...@gmail.com wrote: > Great, a bit ashamed I didn't even try that... Thank you Mauro. No worries, if I recall correctly, I know because I had asked too...

Re: [julia-users] Generic Linux binaries for julia-0.4.6

Great, a bit ashamed I didn't even try that... Thank you Mauro.

Re: [julia-users] Re: indirect array indexing

For simple cases there's also the IndirectArrays package: https://github.com/JuliaArrays/IndirectArrays.jl Best, --Tim On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:51 PM, wrote: > OK! many thanks for your fast reply > --a > > > On Friday, September 30, 2016 at 3:53:43 PM UTC+2,