I am neutral about 1 and 2. But I like suggestion 3.
Well said. +1.
On Saturday, May 7, 2016 at 1:49:16 AM UTC-7, DNF wrote:
>
> I find 'end' to be the best choice of block terminator among the ones I
> have seen.
>
> It is very clear and explicit, there is no doubt as to what it means,
> unlike '}' which is way too small and ambiguous (does it m
I tend to agree that explicit broadcasting is better than numpy's default
behavior.
However, IMO operations on the n-d arrays is better defaulted to
element-wise, and n-d with scalar default to element-wise too.
Think about it, a lot of operations are not even commonly defined for 3-d
and abov
numpy arrays operate element-wise by default, and have broadcasting (binary
singleton expansion) behaviors by default. in julia you have to do (.> ,
.<, .==) all the time.
;
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Siyi Deng > wrote:
>
>> Hi, my array as follows:
>>
>>
>> b =
>> [4.67933552111843e-07,-6.32591924726271e-05,-0.000160070579209537,-0.000332845978767382,-0.000588690359282295,
>>
>>
without seeing exactly what you're running.
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Siyi Deng > wrote:
>
>> No, I'm copy and pasting the array, from a text editor to the REPL, and
>> it hangs there.
>>
>> On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 7:53:29 PM UTC-7, Stef
Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Siyi Deng > wrote:
>
>> Hi, I have a coefficient array which looks like b =
>> [4.67933552111843e-07,-6.32591924726271e-05,-0.000160070579209537, ],
>> with about 320 elements. The entire array in ascii is about 7000 chars.
>>
>
Hi, I have a coefficient array which looks like b =
[4.67933552111843e-07,-6.32591924726271e-05,-0.000160070579209537, ],
with about 320 elements. The entire array in ascii is about 7000 chars.
I cannot paste the array directly in REPL, julia simply stuck. I cannot put
it in a script and i
It turns out that julia 0.3.4 didn't enforce immutable in ccalls, and I
should be using mutable types to store states. Thanks for the help
everybody!
On Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 7:28:16 PM UTC-7, Siyi Deng wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have created a c shared library using visual-studio;
file that as an issue on the Julia repo?
>
> On 3 April 2015 at 15:09, Siyi Deng >
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike:
>> I followed your suggestion , the Julia version used by Juno was 0.3.4 and
>> the standalone REPL was 0.3.7 (all x86_64-w64-mingw32), so indeed it seems
&g
Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 9:50:46 PM UTC-7, Kevin Squire wrote:
>
> Hi Siyi,
>
> Can you give a short example of your code? It's generally pretty hard to
> debug these things without that.
>
> Cheers!
>Kevin
>
> On Thursday, April 2, 2015, Siyi Deng >
en introduced by a
> backport or something similar.
>
> On 3 April 2015 at 05:50, Kevin Squire >
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Siyi,
>>
>> Can you give a short example of your code? It's generally pretty hard to
>> debug these things without that.
>>
>> Ch
Hi,
I have created a c shared library using visual-studio; then I called the c
functions in Juno IDE, everything worked as expected.
Then I installed the julia command line version, and ran the same script
again, and this time it seems that the c functions has not been called
properly, no excep
13 matches
Mail list logo
