Re: [julia-users] Debugger

> > > > wrote: > > > > >> Is there anyone currently focusing on building an AST-level > debugger > > > > > > that > > > > > > > >> can navigate stack frames and not require modifying code to insert > > > > >> instrumentation stubs, etc? > > > > >> > > > > >> While the LLVM JIT debugger referenced in the below thread from > > > > > > December > > > > > > > >> 2013 is interesting, seems like there might be more low-lying > fruit > > > > > > out > > > > > > > >> there. > > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/julia-users/debugger/julia-use > > > > > > > >> rs/zEqWxn7HDVo/ZTRZh4ziR9kJ > >

Re: [julia-users] Debugger

urok < > michae...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> Is there anyone currently focusing on building an AST-level > debugger > > > > > > that > > > > > > > >> can navigate stack frames and not require modifying code to insert > > > > >> instrumentation stubs, etc? > > > > >> > > > > >> While the LLVM JIT debugger referenced in the below thread from > > > > > > December > > > > > > > >> 2013 is interesting, seems like there might be more low-lying > fruit > > > > > > out > > > > > > > >> there. > > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/julia-users/debugger/julia-use > > > > > > > >> rs/zEqWxn7HDVo/ZTRZh4ziR9kJ > >

Re: [julia-users] Debugger

ntly focusing on building an AST-level debugger > > > > that > > > > > >> can navigate stack frames and not require modifying code to insert > > > >> instrumentation stubs, etc? > > > >> > > > >> While the LLVM JIT debugger referenced in the below thread from > > > > December > > > > > >> 2013 is interesting, seems like there might be more low-lying fruit > > > > out > > > > > >> there. > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/julia-users/debugger/julia-use > > > > > >> rs/zEqWxn7HDVo/ZTRZh4ziR9kJ

Re: [julia-users] Debugger

d not require modifying code to insert > > >> instrumentation stubs, etc? > > >> > > >> While the LLVM JIT debugger referenced in the below thread from > December > > >> 2013 is interesting, seems like there might be more low-lying fruit > out > > >> there. > > >> > > >> > > >> > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/julia-users/debugger/julia-use > > >> rs/zEqWxn7HDVo/ZTRZh4ziR9kJ > >

Re: [julia-users] Debugger

; that can navigate stack frames and not require modifying code to insert >>> instrumentation stubs, etc? >>> >>> While the LLVM JIT debugger referenced in the below thread from December >>> 2013 is interesting, seems like there might be more low-lying fruit out >&

Re: [julia-users] Debugger

> >> can navigate stack frames and not require modifying code to insert > >> instrumentation stubs, etc? > >> > >> While the LLVM JIT debugger referenced in the below thread from December > >> 2013 is interesting, seems like there might be more low-ly

Re: [julia-users] Debugger

M JIT debugger referenced in the below thread from December >> 2013 is interesting, seems like there might be more low-lying fruit out >> there..... >> >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/julia-users/debugger/julia-users/zEqWxn7HDVo/ZTRZh4ziR9kJ >> > >

Re: [julia-users] Debugger

tubs, etc? > > While the LLVM JIT debugger referenced in the below thread from December > 2013 is interesting, seems like there might be more low-lying fruit out > there. > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/julia-users/debugger/julia-users/zEqWxn7HDVo/ZTRZh4ziR9kJ >

[julia-users] Debugger

low-lying fruit out there. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/julia-users/debugger/julia-users/zEqWxn7HDVo/ZTRZh4ziR9kJ