If you don't need to do anything order-dependent until after the
pop-appending is done, you could probably use cyclic access when
calculating the matrices in your algorithm, and then re-order based on the
number of permutations you've performed. If your algorithm generates N+d
columns, and you
I think the order is important, although I am not sure. I can test for
that. However what is very important is that V and W have the same order.
Do you actually care about the order of columns? Or can you just use a cyclic
representation?
V[:, mod1(col, N)] = v
--Tim
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 04:48:08 PM Carlos Baptista wrote:
> I have an iterative algorithm in which two matrices with a fixed number of
> rows grow in number of columns. Th
I have an iterative algorithm in which two matrices with a fixed number of
rows grow in number of columns. The algorithm requires only the last *N*columns
(where N is a predefined fixed integer). If the number of columns
grow to *N + d*, then the first *d* columns are no longer required and can