Hi,
It seems that FactCheck.jl has become the defacto standard for writing
tests in Julia packages. Wouldn't it be a good idea to have it bundled with
Julia? Any reason to keep the current test framework?
-Júlio
Actually that's not true. AFAIK, people are switching back to the new
testing in Base, and FactCheck will be deprecated eventually. (Unless I got
the wrong memo?)
On Friday, October 14, 2016, Júlio Hoffimann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that FactCheck.jl has become the defacto standard for writing
Oh really? I'm not following it closely. Please let me know why that is the
case, I was planning to switch to FactCheck.
-Júlio
On Oct 14, 2016 8:52 PM, "Júlio Hoffimann"
wrote:
>
> Oh really? I'm not following it closely. Please let me know why that is
the case, I was planning to switch to FactCheck.
Afaict the new test in base is a improved version of FactCheck.
>
> -Júlio
Ok, I am not switching to FactCheck then, didn't knew it is being
deprecated in a sense.
Thank you,
-Júlio
2016-10-14 18:05 GMT-07:00 Yichao Yu :
> On Oct 14, 2016 8:52 PM, "Júlio Hoffimann"
> wrote:
> >
> > Oh really? I'm not following it closely. Please let me know why that is
> the case, I w
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Júlio Hoffimann
wrote:
> Ok, I am not switching to FactCheck then, didn't knew it is being
> deprecated in a sense.
>
You can switch to BaseTestNext if you need 0.4 compatibility.
>
> Thank you,
> -Júlio
>
> 2016-10-14 18:05 GMT-07:00 Yichao Yu :
>
>> On Oct 14
