Oh, and just so people are clear, you don't need to touch the default test
script at all unless you want to be adventurous and try testing against
0.2.x on OS X. For 0.3, 0.3.x, and future versions the default test script
should be fine.
On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 5:20:06 AM UTC-7, Tony
How are we doing on the software side for performance tracking? Any
concrete plan yet?
On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 6:16:07 PM UTC+2, Stefan Karpinski wrote:
Hardware for automated performance tracking has been ordered and should
arrive next month.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:13 PM,
This is great progress.
Along these lines is there a way for doing bench marking against different
versions of the code?
On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 7:20:06 AM UTC-5, Tony Kelman wrote:
Hey folks, an announcement for package authors and users who care about
testing:
We've had support
Hardware for automated performance tracking has been ordered and should
arrive next month.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Michael Prentiss mcprent...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is great progress.
Similarly, is there a way for benchmarking on different versions of the
code?
Automating this
That is great news. Well done.
This is great progress.
Similarly, is there a way for benchmarking on different versions of the
code?
Automating this will be very helpful.
