Re: [julia-users] Re: Classification with Julia

A "Bayes" classifier is a well defined entity that is semantically separate from the "Optimal Bayesian" Classifier. But you're right that the risk of confusion is probably low seeing as the Bayes classifier is primarily theoretical (given that the nee

Re: [julia-users] Re: Classification with Julia

I suspect the optimal is necessary as it's a common rhetoric in certain statistical communities. Cf. optimal classification as described in political science. -- John On Aug 13, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > Cool stuff. May I preemptively suggest calling it BayesianClassifiers

Re: [julia-users] Re: Classification with Julia

Cool stuff. May I preemptively suggest calling it BayesianClassifiers? I'm assuming the "optimal" part is redundant since no one will be clamoring for suboptimal Bayesian classifiers. > On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Jason Knight wrote: > > I'm currently working with Optimal Bayesian Classifier

[julia-users] Re: Classification with Julia

I'm currently working with Optimal Bayesian Classifiers with my not-really-ready-for-public-consumption package OBC.jl . It's currently quite specialized for bioinformatics (RNA-Seq) data, so probably not what you want, but I thought I'd throw it out there.

[julia-users] Re: Classification with Julia

svaksha's curated listing is a good resource for this type of question-- https://github.com/svaksha/Julia.jl/blob/master/AI.md On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 8:20:51 AM UTC-4, Anuj Prakash wrote: > > Hey > > I wanted to know about some good Julia packages for binary classification. > Feel free to