Re: [julia-users] Re: Conda.jl needs a new maintainer

2016-09-07 Thread Tony Kelman
s bound to a personal account, i.e. I don’t > think you can have the second type of URL. > > > > *From:* julia...@googlegroups.com [mailto: > julia...@googlegroups.com ] *On Behalf Of *Steven G. Johnson > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 7, 2016 1:49 PM > *To:* julia-users

RE: [julia-users] Re: Conda.jl needs a new maintainer

2016-09-07 Thread David Anthoff
: [julia-users] Re: Conda.jl needs a new maintainer I'm not completely sure of the right way to re-enable AppVeyor ... I did it for PyCall, but it shows up as https://ci.appveyor.com/project/StevenGJohnson/pycall-jl-nu3aa how do I enable it as https://ci.appveyor.com/project/JuliaPy/p

Re: [julia-users] Re: Conda.jl needs a new maintainer

2016-09-07 Thread Steven G. Johnson
I'm not completely sure of the right way to re-enable AppVeyor ... I did it for PyCall, but it shows up as https://ci.appveyor.com/project/StevenGJohnson/pycall-jl-nu3aa how do I enable it as https://ci.appveyor.com/project/JuliaPy/pycall-jl? On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 1:46:08 PM U

Re: [julia-users] Re: Conda.jl needs a new maintainer

2016-09-07 Thread Tony Kelman
Please re enable all CI services for every repo that was moved into that prganization. Travis and AppVeyor don't always handle repo moves very well.

Re: [julia-users] Re: Conda.jl needs a new maintainer

2016-09-06 Thread Steven G. Johnson
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 3:45:48 PM UTC-4, Ismael Venegas Castelló wrote: > > Hello everyone! > > Viral I don't find the JuliaPy organization is it on github? > https://github.com/JuliaPy

Re: [julia-users] Re: Conda.jl needs a new maintainer

2016-09-06 Thread Steven G. Johnson
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 12:42:05 PM UTC-4, Tony Kelman wrote: > > Overlaps quite a bit with JuliaInterop, doesn't it? Conda isn't strictly a > Python package manager, though it's most often used that way. > Yes, there is a certain amount of overlap. On the other hand, it makes a cert

Re: [julia-users] Re: Conda.jl needs a new maintainer

2016-09-06 Thread Ismael Venegas Castelló
Hello everyone! Viral I don't find the JuliaPy organization is it on github? There iare also Gettext.jl, Pandas.jl, GeographicLibPy.jl, PyLexYacc.jl, PyLogging.jl, PyX.jl and SGP4.jl as far as I can tell, plus from the ones Steven mentioned. El martes, 6 de septiembre de 2016, 9:42:08 (UTC-5),

Re: [julia-users] Re: Conda.jl needs a new maintainer

2016-09-06 Thread Tony Kelman
Overlaps quite a bit with JuliaInterop, doesn't it? Conda isn't strictly a Python package manager, though it's most often used that way. On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 7:42:08 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: > > Created JuliaPy and sent the invites to authors and contributors of > various py*.jl

Re: [julia-users] Re: Conda.jl needs a new maintainer

2016-09-06 Thread Viral Shah
Created JuliaPy and sent the invites to authors and contributors of various py*.jl packages. -viral On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 7:32:34 PM UTC+5:30, Steven G. Johnson wrote: > > Viral, can you set up JuliaPy and send invites to the relevant people? >

Re: [julia-users] Re: Conda.jl needs a new maintainer

2016-09-06 Thread Steven G. Johnson
Viral, can you set up JuliaPy and send invites to the relevant people?

Re: [julia-users] Re: Conda.jl needs a new maintainer

2016-09-06 Thread Steven G. Johnson
Yes, let's please make a JuliaPy org with Conda (and PyCall and PyJulia and probably PyPlot and maybe SymPy), so that Cedric and me and others can help maintain Conda etc.

Re: [julia-users] Re: Conda.jl needs a new maintainer

2016-09-06 Thread Cedric St-Jean
Conda.jl is awesome, and important for ScikitLearn.jl, thank you for your work on it. I hope you find someone, but I'll step in if you don't. On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 12:08:31 PM UTC-4, wookyoung noh wrote: > > Hello, Luthaf > > It's sad that you're leaving for a while. > I wish to you wou

Re: [julia-users] Re: Conda.jl needs a new maintainer

2016-09-05 Thread wookyoung noh
Hello, Luthaf It's sad that you're leaving for a while. I wish to you would come back early. Thanks. Best regards, WooKyoung Noh On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 9:46:33 PM UTC+9, Luthaf wrote: > > Hi, > > Yes, I may try again to use it when the ecoystem and the languages are a > bit more stab

Re: [julia-users] Re: Conda.jl needs a new maintainer

2016-09-05 Thread Luthaf
Hi, Yes, I may try again to use it when the ecoystem and the languages are a bit more stable. I am OK with the JuliaPy organization, but Conda.jl can also be used for pure C/C++/Fortran dependencies, without any link to Python. -- Luthaf Viral Shah a écrit : Hi Luthaf, Sorry to hear that

[julia-users] Re: Conda.jl needs a new maintainer

2016-09-05 Thread Viral Shah
Hi Luthaf, Sorry to hear that you are not using Julia anymore. Hopefully you will come back in the future. I am wondering if we should create a JuliaPy organization and move many important building blocks and python wrapper packages there, if the various authors think it is a good idea. -vira