[julia-users] Re: Julia garbage collection - question on status and future (and interaction when using with other languages)

2015-10-23 Thread Jonathan Malmaud
On Tuesday, October 20, 2015 at 8:10:07 AM UTC-4, Páll Haraldsson wrote: > > > A. I know Julia had stop the world garbage collection (GC) and changed to > generational GC in 0.4 that is faster (I've seen 10x mentioned). > > As far as I know, there are no knobs to turn (except possible to just t

Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia garbage collection - question on status and future (and interaction when using with other languages)

2015-10-23 Thread Yichao Yu
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Jonathan Malmaud wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, October 20, 2015 at 8:10:07 AM UTC-4, Páll Haraldsson wrote: >> >> >> A. I know Julia had stop the world garbage collection (GC) and changed to >> generational GC in 0.4 that is faster (I've seen 10x mentioned). >> >> As

Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia garbage collection - question on status and future (and interaction when using with other languages)

2015-10-24 Thread Uwe Fechner
You wrote: "... note that `malloc/free` are not hard real time either, you basically cannot have any sort of memory allocation for that. " It is an old myth, that you cannot have any memory allocation for hard real-time applications. For me, and probably also for other people who do real-time si