I believe it is all in place now:
https://github.com/ReidAtcheson/RaggedArrays.jl
There is not a versioned release yet, which I will wait to do until it is a
little more fleshed out. Functionality is still basic.
On Wednesday, September 3, 2014 10:08:40 AM UTC-5, Stefan Karpinski wrote:
>
> I
I like the idea of renaming this to Ragged array. I'll go ahead and do
that, and try to package-ify this. If I step on any toes here by using
"ragged array" then I guess people will let me know. Enforcing data
contiguity might make certain operations hard that people might expect to
be useful -
I think RaggedArrays.jl is a good, clear name. Looking forward to a
packaged version!
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Reid Atcheson
wrote:
> I like the idea of renaming this to Ragged array. I'll go ahead and do
> that, and try to package-ify this. If I step on any toes here by using
> "ragged
+1 for such a package.and for "Ragged Array".
I think this sort of thing is usually called a "ragged array", you might
find more use cases, examples, etc., googling for that term.
+1 on having a package for this, Array{Array{T}} often feels very awkward.
On Tuesday, September 2, 2014 9:03:56 AM UTC-7, Reid Atcheson wrote:
>
> A common situa