Re: [julia-users] Re: PSA: New package registration requirements

2016-09-08 Thread Tony Kelman
You can modify the branch on your metadata fork and remove some of the tag files. Usually Pkg.publish is used after just one or two local Pkg.tag's.

Re: [julia-users] Re: PSA: New package registration requirements

2016-09-08 Thread Deniz Yuret
How can I specify which tags are registered? I think the default commands I used (Pkg.tag,register, and publish) ended up trying to register all existing tags in metadata. On Thu, Sep 8, 2016, 18:47 Tony Kelman wrote: > git tags that don't get registered in metadata should be fine. What were >

Re: [julia-users] Re: PSA: New package registration requirements

2016-09-08 Thread Tony Kelman
git tags that don't get registered in metadata should be fine. What were you seeing happen?

Re: [julia-users] Re: PSA: New package registration requirements

2016-09-07 Thread Deniz Yuret
Can tags be used for anything other than versioning in a Package? I was registering a package with non-version tags marking some important development points (e.g. a "naacl2016" tag) and the package manager was not happy about it. If no tags are allowed other than the vX.Y.Z tags, is the comm

Re: [julia-users] Re: PSA: New package registration requirements

2015-10-01 Thread Jiahao Chen
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Bill Hart wrote: > Just to clarify, "New package version tags must support at least Julia > version 0.3" means that not supporting 0.3 is ok, i.e. just supporting 0.4 > and up is ok? > > And that would be 0.4 if it's 0.4 release and up and 0.4- if it is 0.4 > prere

[julia-users] Re: PSA: New package registration requirements

2015-10-01 Thread Bill Hart
Just to clarify, "New package version tags must support at least Julia version 0.3" means that not supporting 0.3 is ok, i.e. just supporting 0.4 and up is ok? And that would be 0.4 if it's 0.4 release and up and 0.4- if it is 0.4 prereleases and up (the only meaningful thing for 0.4 at this po