[julia-users] Re: Plasma Actuator Simulation

2015-09-28 Thread John Gibson
Marius: I think you'd be better off in learning to write fast Julia code if you presented an straightforward implementation of a classic PDE problem and asked for help in optimizing that. Maybe 2D heat equation would be a good place to start. The code you've presented is not really intelligible

Re: [julia-users] Re: Plasma Actuator Simulation

2015-09-28 Thread Stefan Karpinski
I don't know anything about plasma physics, but this entire code is in global scope and uses a bunch of non-const global arrays. This is the very first thing the performance tips warn against: http://julia.readthedocs.org/en/latest/manual/performance-tips/ Refactor your code into functions that

[julia-users] Re: Plasma Actuator Simulation

2015-09-28 Thread Michael Prentiss
In my experience it is helpful to have a Fortran version to compare speeds against when learning Julia. This would be easy w.r.t. your problem. It is easy to right functional Julia code that is very slow, but looks okay. The best way for me was to have have a basis of comparison. On Monday,

[julia-users] Re: Plasma Actuator Simulation

2015-09-28 Thread Luke Stagner
Ok...wow...I am not surprised it is slow. Well here is what you could try. 1. Wrap everything into a function. Julia has difficulty with globals. 2. You are defining pointless functions in a loop. You can easily change the code to exclude them 3. In your loops you are accessing arrays in row