Re: [julia-users] Re: Scientific papers using Julia

The Wikimedia Research Newsletter[1] has been using icons for open access[2] / closed access[3] next to each publication. That's an interesting approach that could be adopted in the Julia publications page for easy visual identification of the freely accessible publications, without splitting t

Re: [julia-users] Re: Scientific papers using Julia

I do not see the rationale behind splitting papers using Julia into free and not free journals. In any case I really think that having a fair representation on what is scientific usage of Julia, could be beneficial both to developers and a source of inspiration for potential users. A On Frida

Re: [julia-users] Re: Scientific papers using Julia

3 sections is appropriate * About Julia * Using Julia * Using Julia, but non free access (if we are going to list those at all). kl. 21:40:37 UTC+1 fredag 21. mars 2014 skrev Stefan Karpinski følgende: > > I think we should split the publications page into two sections: papers > about Julia at th

Re: [julia-users] Re: Scientific papers using Julia

I think we should split the publications page into two sections: papers about Julia at the top and papers using Julia below. On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Tobias Knopp wrote: > At some point we probably should start thinking about initiating a > scientific journal around Julia. > There might

Re: [julia-users] Re: Scientific papers using Julia

At some point we probably should start thinking about initiating a scientific journal around Julia. There might be already enough momentum for such a thing given how many academic people are around here. Am Freitag, 21. März 2014 21:17:43 UTC+1 schrieb Isaiah: > > Could just use existing Publica

Re: [julia-users] Re: Scientific papers using Julia

Levi is the an author on the Foulds paper I mentioned, so maybe that's what you're thinking of. I gather Simon Kornblith and and Tim Holy are using Julia for experimental neuroscience data analysis, so obviously the lead time for any publications that result from that will be longer than the machi

Re: [julia-users] Re: Scientific papers using Julia

Could just use existing Publications page and add categories "About Julia" vs "Using Julia" There's also: http://ieee-hpec.org/2013/index_htm_files/49.pdf (which falls somewhere between the two categories) On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Jonathan Malmaud wrote: > Ya, that > works

Re: [julia-users] Re: Scientific papers using Julia

I think there should also be another paper with Levi Boyles as an author. -- John On Mar 21, 2014, at 1:08 PM, Jonathan Malmaud wrote: > Ya, that works. Out of the published papers that use Julia for numeric > computing, and cite the main Julia paper, we have > > Foulds, James, et al. "Stoch

[julia-users] Re: Scientific papers using Julia

Ya, that works. Out of the published papers that use Julia for numeric computing, and cite the main Julia paper, we have - Foulds, James, et al. "Stochastic collapsed variational Bayesian inferen

[julia-users] Re: Scientific papers using Julia

I realised that about 10 seconds after pushing send. Strange how doing something irreversible clears the mind. You might search for citations of those two papers. Ivar kl. 19:19:11 UTC+1 fredag 21. mars 2014 skrev Jonathan Malmaud følgende: > > Well, those are papers about Julia. I meant papers

[julia-users] Re: Scientific papers using Julia

Well, those are papers about Julia. I meant papers that just use Julia as an implementation language in the course of doing other research. Sorry for not being clear. On Friday, March 21, 2014 11:10:12 AM UTC-7, Ivar Nesje wrote: > > It is prominently placed on our homepage: > http://julialang.

[julia-users] Re: Scientific papers using Julia

It is prominently placed on our homepage: http://julialang.org/publications/ Ivar kl. 19:07:40 UTC+1 fredag 21. mars 2014 skrev Jonathan Malmaud følgende: > > Is someone curating a list somewhere of published work that uses Julia? >